Dear R ussers,
My question is, How can my mean be outside the confidence intervals ?!
I think i have the answer for it, but i would like to hear some other
ideas on it.
First my data is not continuose but categorical, it is a titre calculated
on a dilution serie.
It is stored as a column of
Good Mornig All,
How R you today? ;o)
I have lots of questions, but i l start with the simplest one,
to wich i am shy to say, i did not find the answer.
It is the following:
When i make a summary plot like for example plot( summary(glm)),
i get one window, one main title, and 4 graph's in
Thanks Mr.Pr. Ripley,
For pointing me in the good direction,
i use win.graph() so i get an overview of the different graphs.
Until now, i v had no problems with it, hope it stays that way.
for those whom have the same porblem, this is what i do:
win.graph(); op - par(mfrow = c(1,2) , oma=
hello R ussers,
i have the same problem with my data,
for aal the different variables, i have the same number of cases, but the
are often out of detectionlimits so they produce na's .
so the data looks like this:
casevar1var2var3var4 ...
1 9 9 13 11
2
dear Mathew
mean is a Generic function
mean(x...)
in wich x is a data object, like a data frame a list a numeric vector...
so in your example it only reads the first character and then reports it.
try x = c(1,1,2)
mean(x)
kind regards,
Tom
Disclaimer: click here
[[alternative
Dear R ussers,
I'm still working with the categorical models, and i can not do cross
validation on them because odf their nature.
not cv works perfectly on other models so i wonderd if it is possible to
extract the beta's from a categorical model, then use their value in a
0/1 glm.
Their
Thanks Mr. Ellison,
Your remark helped solve my error table problem.
However, I found a new one.
Now that I have my error tables, i realised that it is no good statistical
practise to validate a model, based one one error table.
So i should use a tool like K-fold CV.
ex: binary_model -
, but also
that it does not give reference to the number of test samples, wich is
clear in table 1 ( 30 test samples).
Kind regards,
Tom.
Tom Willems
CODA-CERVA-VAR
Department of Virology
Epizootic Diseases Section
Groeselenberg 99
B-1180 Ukkel
Tel.: +32 2 3790522
Fax: +32 2 3790666
E-mail
as - AIC .
R displays it as a positive number, does this mean that a large AIC
gives a small - AIC , so the bigger the better?
Kind regards,
Tom.
Tom Willems
CODA-CERVA-VAR
Department of Virology
Epizootic Diseases Section
Groeselenberg 99
B-1180 Ukkel
Tel.: +32 2 3790522
Fax: +32 2 3790666
E