After upgrading to 1.7.0 under debian linux, I can't get e1071 working
properly.
The first problem I had was that g++-3.0 was the standard compiler but
wasn't installed, so I installed it. e1071 then installed correctly, but I
get the following:
[EMAIL
Andrew,
1) The current R version is 1.7.1
2) Which version of `e1071' are you using?
3) Does the `e1071.so' file exist (in e1071/libs)?
best,
David.
On 2003.06.24 21:43, Andrew Perrin wrote:
After upgrading to 1.7.0 under debian linux, I can't get e1071 working
properly.
The first problem I had
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, David Meyer wrote:
Andrew,
1) The current R version is 1.7.1
hmmm...:
perrin:/usr/local/lib/R/site-library# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
OK, thanks. Is that the problem with e1071? Any advice on getting it
loaded?
Thanks.
--
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:47:19PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
OK, thanks. Is that the problem with e1071? Any advice on getting it
loaded?
[ It is considered impolite to reply to private messages via the list. ]
You misunderstand: R in Debian is in unstable. e1071 is an add-on package
that
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:47:19PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
OK, thanks. Is that the problem with e1071? Any advice on getting it
loaded?
[ It is considered impolite to reply to private messages via the list. ]
Sorry for any impoliteness. I
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:57PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
[ It is considered impolite to reply to private messages via the list. ]
Sorry for any impoliteness. I was trying to ask the whole list, since I
suspect the two issues are different.
That's fine, and your privilege. But as a
