Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Kevin E. Thorpe wrote:
Thank you for the information. I have contacted the RPM maintainer
and am awaiting a response.
It occurs to me that my problem could also be fixed by putting
ATLAS on my system. Are there advantages to doing that or any
Thank you for the information. I have contacted the RPM maintainer and
am awaiting a response.
It occurs to me that my problem could also be fixed by putting ATLAS
on my system. Are there advantages to doing that or any reasons not to?
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
-lf77blas is part of ATLAS, so
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Kevin E. Thorpe wrote:
Thank you for the information. I have contacted the RPM maintainer and am
awaiting a response.
It occurs to me that my problem could also be fixed by putting ATLAS on my
system. Are there advantages to doing that or any reasons not to?
It is a
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Kevin E. Thorpe wrote:
Thank you for the information. I have contacted the RPM maintainer and am
awaiting a response.
It occurs to me that my problem could also be fixed by putting ATLAS on my
system. Are there advantages to doing that or any
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Kevin E. Thorpe wrote:
Thank you for the information. I have contacted the RPM maintainer and am
awaiting a response.
It occurs to me that my problem could also be fixed by putting ATLAS on
my
-lf77blas is part of ATLAS, so I do suspect the RPM builder had ATLAS
installed.
lme4 needs a compatible Matrix installed.
I do think installing from the sources would solve this, but probably you
need to discuss this with the RPM maintainer as a dependency appears to
be missing.
On Fri, 15
I just upgraded to version 2.1.1 (from 2.0.1) today.
R.version
_
platform i686-pc-linux-gnu
arch i686
os linux-gnu
system i686, linux-gnu
status
major2
minor1.1
year 2005
month06
day 20
language R
I am using SuSE 9.2 and did the upgrade using rpm -U
