Re: [R] Minor documentation issue

2006-04-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 4/21/2006 9:26 PM, Vivek Satsangi wrote: (Sorry about the last email which was incomplete. I hit 'send' accidentally). I looked at ?seq. One of the forms given under Usage is seq(from). This would be the form used if seq is called with only one

[R] Minor documentation issue

2006-04-21 Thread Vivek Satsangi
I looked at ?seq -- -- Vivek Satsangi Rochester, NY USA __ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

[R] Minor documentation issue

2006-04-21 Thread Vivek Satsangi
(Sorry about the last email which was incomplete. I hit 'send' accidentally). I looked at ?seq. One of the forms given under Usage is seq(from). This would be the form used if seq is called with only one argument. However, this should actually say seq(to). For example, seq(1) [1] 1 seq(3) [1] 1

Re: [R] Minor documentation issue

2006-04-21 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
It is matched by the first argument which is called from even though, as the documentation indicates under the explanation of the last form, it refers to the ending value. Note, for example, that seq(from = 3) gives 1:3 and not 3:1. Also the help file does say: The interpretation of the

Re: [R] Minor documentation issue

2006-04-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 4/21/2006 9:26 PM, Vivek Satsangi wrote: (Sorry about the last email which was incomplete. I hit 'send' accidentally). I looked at ?seq. One of the forms given under Usage is seq(from). This would be the form used if seq is called with only one argument. However, this should actually say