It seems to me that \concept{} is simply another code for My keyword is
your search term. I do not consider myself to be one of the better
informed users of R, yet the frequency with which I resort to a full text
search is less than once a month. For such an infrequent task, I find it no
problem
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 5:26 AM
To: Jonathan Baron
Cc: Adaikalavan Ramasamy; John Fox; R-help; 'Berton Gunter'
Subject: Re: [R] Proposal for New R List: Criticism? Comments?
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Jonathan Baron wrote:
On 09/10/04 03:54
-Original Message-
From: Martin Maechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:57 AM
To: John Fox
Cc: 'R-help'
Subject: RE: [R] Proposal for New R List: Criticism? Comments?
Hi John et al.
I'm coming late to this thread (because of vacation),
JohnF
On 09/10/04 03:54, Adaikalavan Ramasamy wrote:
There is another issue to be considered. Currently you need to have the
relevant packages installed before help.search() bring it up. My work
around this is to install all available packages just in case the
function I need is nestled in some
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Jonathan Baron wrote:
On 09/10/04 03:54, Adaikalavan Ramasamy wrote:
There is another issue to be considered. Currently you need to have the
relevant packages installed before help.search() bring it up. My work
around this is to install all available packages just in case
, September 10, 2004 5:26 AM
To: Jonathan Baron
Cc: Adaikalavan Ramasamy; John Fox; R-help; 'Berton Gunter'
Subject: Re: [R] Proposal for New R List: Criticism? Comments?
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Jonathan Baron wrote:
On 09/10/04 03:54, Adaikalavan Ramasamy wrote:
There is another issue
Just finished updating and installing new packages from CRAN and
BioConductor (including annotation data) and am happy to say that my R
has just exceeded the 1 GB mark.
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 10:11, Jonathan Baron wrote:
On 09/10/04 03:54, Adaikalavan Ramasamy wrote:
There is another issue to
Folks:
I would like to propose a new R list, tentatively labeled r-contents. I wish
to briefly explain the purpose and format here and solicit public comments,
pro or con, so feel free to criticize or suggest a better name and other
improvements or alternatives.
R presently consists of a suite
I think that a lot of posts on r-help are exactly of the form you
suggest: How do I do X? Answer: Use Y. (Or maybe, Use Y.
And next time RTFM. But so what. The answer is still there.)
Often, when the answer is not of that form, the question is
unclear. In other cases, the questioner is
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] Proposal for New R List: Criticism? Comments?
Folks:
I would like to propose a new R list, tentatively labeled
r-contents. I wish to briefly explain the purpose and format
here and solicit public comments, pro or con, so feel free to
criticize
10 matches
Mail list logo
