I suppose the source for ?%in% in base would be a good place to look:
\name{match}
\alias{match}
\alias{\%in\%}
[...]
\usage{
match(x, table, nomatch = NA, incomparables = FALSE)
x \%in\% table
}
[...]
\details{
\code{\%in\%} is currently defined as \cr
\code{\%in\%
wolski wrote (using a mail client that doesn't wrap lines):
...
Cannot handle Rd file names containing ''.
These are not legal file names on all R platforms.
Please rename the following files and try again:
man/[[-.caliblist.Rd
man/[-.massvectorlist.Rd
man/[[-.massvectorlist.Rd
Ok. It does
Hi!
Old story again. I put it away for a while because there are always other thinks to do.
But I cant deny that I still like to like to comment assignment functions.
Under linux I get.
Cannot handle Rd file names containing ''.
These are not legal file names on all R platforms.
Please rename
Wolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrotes:
I have seen the output and it does not matter to me anymore if prompt
or package.skeleton works on any platform. I hope it wasn't a too big
heresy. If someone would ask me what are the week point of R, then
the only one that pops up immediately, is that the
Philippe Grosjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, writing a quick and durty help for a function with a few lines of
comment above or below the function code (a la Matlab) should be nice. I
don't think that it should be a good idea to provide a complex alternative
solution for documenting the
On 01 Dec 2003 22:15:57 +0100, Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Just one thing to add: If Wolski gets sufficiently annoyed to actually
try and do this right, he'll want a naming scheme that works on *all*
platforms, so branching on sys.info()[sysname]==Windows is surely
wrong.
Probably
Hi!
It would be great If the problem with prompt or package.skeleton would be only the
file naming conventions on different platforms. For me the hack with
gsub(-,=,functionname) and sys.info()[sysname] worked and I generated Rd files
for all my functions.
I have seen the output and it
Wolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have seen the output and it does not matter to me anymore if prompt
or package.skeleton works on any platform. I hope it wasn't a too big
heresy. If someone would ask me what are the week point of R, then
the only one that pops up immediately, is that the
Hi!
Are there scripts or packages for generating Rd files out of S3 code on cran? Has
any one written such scripts (e.g. in Perl?) and are willing to share them?
Thanks in advance.
Eryk.
Dipl. bio-chem. Eryk Witold Wolski@MPI-MG Dep. Vertebrate Genomics
Ihnestrasse 73 14195 Berlin
On 1 Dec 2003 at 13:21, Wolski wrote:
It is not entirely clear what you want, but if you want to translate
S[-Plus] help files to Rd format, there is [windows]
Rcmd Sd2Rd
[unix]
R cmd Sd2Rd
Kjetil Halvorsen
Hi!
Are there scripts or packages for generating Rd files out of S3 code
on cran?
Hi Kjetil!
I have an *.R file with a lot of functions and I am looking for a script which would
generate the skeleton of an Rd file for all functions found in the R file.
It will be nice if the can already generate the name,usage and the arguments
field from the source so that i have to edit
?prompt
?package.skeleton
and do read `Writing R Extensions'
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Wolski wrote:
Hi Kjetil!
I have an *.R file with a lot of functions and I am looking for a script
which would generate the skeleton of an Rd file for all functions found
in the R file. It will be nice if the
Hi!
Seems to me that package.skeleton(...) does not like assignment functions.
System: Windows 2000
package.skeleton(name=testpack,list=ls(),path=c:/home/wolski/devel,force=T)
Creating directories ...
Creating DESCRIPTION ...
Creating READMEs ...
Saving functions and data ...
Error in
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Wolski wrote:
Hi!
Seems to me that package.skeleton(...) does not like assignment functions.
System: Windows 2000
And that's your problem! It's a problem with your OS, not
package.skeleton. And it is known.
Hi!
I can generate the package skeleton under unix.
But i am not shure what are further consequences?
Would it be still possible to
rcmd install ...
the package under windows?
If I stay under windows how than to name the Rd files for assignement functions? Does
it matter how the name of the
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Wolski wrote:
Hi!
I can generate the package skeleton under unix.
But i am not shure what are further consequences?
Would it be still possible to
rcmd install ...
the package under windows?
If I stay under windows how than to name the Rd files for assignement
Hallo!
If it does not matter how the name of the Rd file are,
would it be difficult than to modify the package.skeleton function, so that it works
under windows 2000 too?
Eryk
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/1/2003 at 1:54 PM Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003,
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Wolski wrote:
If it does not matter how the name of the Rd file are, would it be
difficult than to modify the package.skeleton function, so that it works
under windows 2000 too?
Why don't you try to do it and find out how difficult it is *for you*?
--
Brian D. Ripley,
Hi!
Thanks for suggestions.
Sincerely
Eryk
Ps.
In the attachment are prompt and package.skeleton modified so that it works on windows
2000 too.
It substitutes - in file names = before writing if sys.info()[sysname]==Windows.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/1/2003 at 2:23 PM
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Wolski wrote:
In the attachment are prompt and package.skeleton modified so that it
works on windows 2000 too. It substitutes - in file names = before
writing if sys.info()[sysname]==Windows.
However, that is nowhere near sufficient: please take a look at the Perl
file
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Wolski wrote:
In the attachment are prompt and package.skeleton modified so that it
works on windows 2000 too. It substitutes - in file names = before
writing if sys.info()[sysname]==Windows.
However, that is nowhere near
21 matches
Mail list logo
