[R] Seeking Packaging advice

2003-08-27 Thread Ross Boylan
I have two questions about packaging up code. 1) Weave/tangle advisable? In the course of extending some C code already in S, I had to work out the underlying math. It seems to me useful to keep this information with the code, using Knuth's tangle/weave type tools. I know there is some support

Re: [R] Seeking Packaging advice

2003-08-27 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ross Boylan wrote: I have two questions about packaging up code. 1) Weave/tangle advisable? In the course of extending some C code already in S, I had to work out the underlying math. It seems to me useful to keep this information with the code, using Knuth's

Re: [R] Seeking Packaging advice

2003-08-27 Thread Roger Koenker
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ross Boylan wrote: So do people have any thoughts about whether introducing this is a step forward or back? A useful analogue: we now distribute Fortran code not the original Ratfor. As a footnote to Brian's comment, I

Re: [R] Seeking Packaging advice

2003-08-27 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ross Boylan wrote: 2) Modifications of existing packages. I modified the survival package (I'm not sure if that's properly called a base package, but it's close). I know in this particular case, if I'm serious, I probably should contact the package maintainer. But this