I recommend you get the latest version 1.8.1 beta. I also had some
memory problems and that fixed it.
Kind regards,
Jesper Frickmann
Statistician, Quality Control
Novozymes North America Inc.
Tel. +1 919 494 3266
Fax +1 919 494 3460
__
[EMAIL
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:43:12 -0500, JFRI (Jesper Frickmann)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I recommend you get the latest version 1.8.1 beta. I also had some
memory problems and that fixed it.
1.8.1 has been released, so there's no more beta. The release is
available on CRAN (see
Salem, OR 97301 Ph: 503-986-4104
---
Message: 21
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:51:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Douglas Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Windows Memory Issues
To: Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:
[EMAIL
please consult the
original.
Message: 21
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:51:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Douglas Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Windows Memory Issues
To: Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset
Avenue
Rahway, New Jersey 07065-0900
USA
Phone: 732 594 3913
Fax: 732 594 1565
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Windows Memory Issues
the current version of R for Windows and will be greater ~3GB
for R 1.9). Thanks again.
Ben Stabler
-Original Message-
From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:29 AM
To: STABLER Benjamin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Windows Memory Issues
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply. So are you saying that multiple calls to gc() frees
up memory to Windows and then other processes can use that newly freed
memory?
No. You typically can't free memory back to Windows (or many other OSes).
So
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply. So are you saying that multiple calls to gc() frees
up memory to Windows and then other processes can use that newly freed
memory? So multiple calls to gc() does not actually make more memory
That is what I said. Why do
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Thomas Lumley wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply. So are you saying that multiple calls to gc() frees
up memory to Windows and then other processes can use that newly freed
memory?
No. You typically can't free memory back to
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
I think you misunderstand how R uses memory. gc() does not free up all
the memory used for the objects it frees, and repeated calls will free
more. Don't speculate about how memory management works: do your
homework!
Are you saying that
Hi all,
I am currently building an application based on R 1.7.1 (+ compiled
C/C++ code + MySql + VB). I am building this application to work on 2
different platforms (Windows XP Professional (500mb memory) and Windows
NT 4.0 with service pack 6 (1gb memory)). This is a very memory
intensive
I think you misunderstand how R uses memory. gc() does not free up all
the memory used for the objects it frees, and repeated calls will free
more. Don't speculate about how memory management works: do your
homework!
In any case, you are using an outdated version of R, and your first
course
Richard Pugh wrote:
...
I have run into some issues regarding the way R handles its memory,
especially on NT.
...
Actually, you've run into NT's nasty memory management. Welcome! :)
R-core have worked very hard to work around Windows memory issues, so
they've probably got a better answer than
13 matches
Mail list logo
