Re: [R] e1071, R1.9.0, Solaris 2.9, should I be worried?

2004-06-13 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Rong-En Fan wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:38:44PM +1200, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: In R 1.9.0 running under Solaris 2.9 on a SunBlade 100, with Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C++ 5.3 2001/05/15 as the C++ compiler, I just did How worried should I be? I guess the

Re: [R] e1071, R1.9.0, Solaris 2.9, should I be worried?

2004-06-12 Thread Rong-En Fan
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:38:44PM +1200, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: In R 1.9.0 running under Solaris 2.9 on a SunBlade 100, with Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C++ 5.3 2001/05/15 as the C++ compiler, I just did How worried should I be? I guess the Warning: x hides Solver::x warnings related to a

Re: [R] e1071, R1.9.0, Solaris 2.9, should I be worried?

2004-06-09 Thread Orit Harel (Gdalyahu)
Hi How are you ? Did you get any answer regarding String literal converted to char* ? Thanks. Thanks and regards, Orit Harel * 972-9-7767513 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs, protected from disclosure, and may be privileged. The

[R] e1071, R1.9.0, Solaris 2.9, should I be worried?

2004-05-24 Thread Richard A. O'Keefe
In R 1.9.0 running under Solaris 2.9 on a SunBlade 100, with Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C++ 5.3 2001/05/15 as the C++ compiler, I just did install.packages(e1071) The output includes these lines, which I have wrapped to fit nicely in mail: ** libs cc -I/users/local/lib/R/include -I/usr/local/include