RE: [R] recover should send messages to stderr, not stdout

2004-05-12 Thread Vadim Ogranovich
-Original Message- From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:21 PM To: Vadim Ogranovich Cc: R-Help Subject: Re: [R] recover should send messages to stderr, not stdout ... Note that some of us consider recover() to be designed

RE: [R] recover should send messages to stderr, not stdout

2004-05-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Vadim Ogranovich wrote: -Original Message- From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:21 PM To: Vadim Ogranovich Cc: R-Help Subject: Re: [R] recover should send messages to stderr, not stdout ... Note

Re: [R] recover should send messages to stderr, not stdout

2004-05-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
recover() is a pure R function, so you can very easily edit it to meet your requirements. You could also submit a patched version for consideration after testing. Note that some of us consider recover() to be designed for interactive-only use, and use something like

[R] recover should send messages to stderr, not stdout

2004-05-11 Thread Vadim Ogranovich
Hi, recover() sends all its messages, which I consider to be error messages, to stdout. I think they more properly belong to stderr. This is an important difference for those of us who use R in batch mode to generate ASCII files. Thanks, Vadim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]