-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Schwartz
Sent: 09 August 2004 15:13
To: Dr Mike Waters
Cc: R-Help
Subject: RE: [R] R packages install problems linux - X not
found (WhiteBoxEL 3)
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 08:13, Dr Mike
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 08:15, Dr Mike Waters wrote:
snip
From unpacking the tarball and running ./configure in the R source
directory, I obtain the fact that crti.o is needed by ld.so and was not
found. This file is not present on the system. This file, along with crtn.o
is usually installed
losses. Everything seems to be fine second time around. I must have been
unlucky.
Regards
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Marc Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2004 15:30
To: Dr Mike Waters
Cc: R-Help
Subject: RE: [R] R packages install problems linux - X not
found
I am concerned by your indications of previously having had RH9 on the
same box and that you had to force an update of the XFree Devel RPM.
Forcing the installation of an RPM is almost always a bad thing.
When you installed WB on the system, did you do a clean installation
or some type of
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 08:13, Dr Mike Waters wrote:
snip
Marc,
Sorry for the confusion yesterday - in my defence, it was very hot and humid
here in Hampshire (31 Celsius at 15:00hrs and still 25 at 20:00hrs).
What had happened was that I had done a clean install of WB Linux, including
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 22:22, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 14:10, Dr Mike Waters wrote:
snip
Thanks for the responses guys.
I used to have RH9 installed on this machine and I found out about the
separate developer
Maybe you can try with the other RHEL clone like CentOS-3:
http://install.linux.duke.edu/pub/linux/add-on/distrib/centos-3.1/i386/rpms/R-1.9.0-0.duke.1.el3.i386.rpm
http://install.linux.duke.edu/pub/linux/add-on/distrib/centos-3.1/i386/srpms/R-1.9.0-0.duke.1.el3.src.rpm
Best wishes,
Muhammad
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:13, Dr Mike Waters wrote:
[SNIP]
Once all this had been sorted out, I was then left with a compilation error
which pointed to a missing dependency or similar, which was not due to
missing developer packages, but, as you and Prof Ripley correctly point out,
from the
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 14:10, Dr Mike Waters wrote:
snip
Thanks for the responses guys.
I used to have RH9 installed on this machine and I found out about the
separate developer packages then. I thought that I had got the relevant
XFree devel package installed, but although it showed up in
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 14:10, Dr Mike Waters wrote:
snip
Thanks for the responses guys.
I used to have RH9 installed on this machine and I found out about the
separate developer packages then. I thought that I had got the relevant
XFree
10 matches
Mail list logo
