RE: [R] More precision problems in testing with Intel compilers

2004-08-23 Thread Samuelson, Frank*
precision problems in testing with Intel compilers FrankSa == Samuelson, Frank* Samuelson on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:22:11 -0400 writes: FrankSa The Intel compiled version also fails the below test: here you give the desired output. What does your 'Intel compiled R' return instead

RE: [R] More precision problems in testing with Intel compilers

2004-08-20 Thread Martin Maechler
FrankSa == Samuelson, Frank* Samuelson on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:22:11 -0400 writes: FrankSa The Intel compiled version also fails the below test: here you give the desired output. What does your 'Intel compiled R' return instead? ### Very big and very small umach -

RE: [R] More precision problems in testing with Intel compilers

2004-08-20 Thread Vadim Ogranovich
-dtor-privacy -m486 -fPIC -DOSRELMAJOR=2 -DOSRELMINOR=4 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Maechler Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 3:39 PM To: Samuelson, Frank* Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Subject: RE: [R] More precision problems

RE: [R] More precision problems in testing with Intel compilers

2004-08-19 Thread Samuelson, Frank*
The Intel compiled version also fails the below test: ### Very big and very small umach - unlist(.Machine)[paste(double.x, c(min,max), sep='')] xmin - umach[1] xmax - umach[2] tx - unique(outer(-1:1,c(.1,1e-3,1e-7)))# 7 values (out of 9) tx - unique(sort(c(outer(umach,1+tx#