.11.1 tcltk_2.11.1 tools_2.
>
> )
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Whoever suggested using the verbose option to see the progress of the
>>> iterations has the right idea.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:50 PM, array chip wrote:
>>>>
chip wrote:
>>> Thank you Peter and Ben for your comments.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message ----
>>> From: Peter Dalgaard
>>> To: array chip
>>> Cc: r-help@r-project.org; r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project
ts.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> - Original Message
>> From: Peter Dalgaard
>> To: array chip
>> Cc: r-help@r-project.org; r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org
>> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 12:28:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [R] lmer() vs.
ter Dalgaard
> To: array chip
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org; r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org
> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 12:28:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [R] lmer() vs. lme() gave different variance component estimates
>
> On 09/20/2010 08:09 PM, array chip wrote:
>> Thank you Pe
Thank you Peter and Ben for your comments.
John
- Original Message
From: Peter Dalgaard
To: array chip
Cc: r-help@r-project.org; r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org
Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 12:28:43 PM
Subject: Re: [R] lmer() vs. lme() gave different variance component estimates
), and I
would expect glht() to give meaningful results. Do check the residuals
for at least approximate normality, though.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Peter Dalgaard
> To: array chip
> Cc: r-hel
org; r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org
Sent: Sat, September 18, 2010 1:35:45 AM
Subject: Re: [R] lmer() vs. lme() gave different variance component estimates
For a nested design, the relation is quite straightforward: The residual
MS are the variances of sample means scaled to be comparable with th
On 09/17/2010 10:50 PM, array chip wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Peter. Actually 3 people from mixed model mailing list tried my
> code
> using lmer(). They got the same results as what I got from lme4(). So they
> couldn't replicate my lmer() results:
>
> Random effects:
> Groups NameVari
gt;
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> From: Peter Dalgaard
> To: array chip
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Sent: Fri, September 17, 2010 1:05:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [R] lmer() vs. lme() gave different variance component
> estimates
>
>
: Fri, September 17, 2010 1:05:27 PM
Subject: Re: [R] lmer() vs. lme() gave different variance component estimates
On 09/17/2010 09:14 PM, array chip wrote:
> Hi, I asked this on mixed model mailing list, but that list is not very
> active,
>
> so I'd like to try the general R ma
On 09/17/2010 09:14 PM, array chip wrote:
> Hi, I asked this on mixed model mailing list, but that list is not very
> active,
> so I'd like to try the general R mailing list. Sorry if anyone receives the
> double post.
>
>
> Hi, I have a dataset of animals receiving some eye treatments. There
11 matches
Mail list logo