Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread Ken Knoblauch
Achim. Indeed, you are right. That is where the problem is. Thanks for helping localize it a bit further. So, I should cc this to the r-sig-mac list. For the r-sig-mac list, here is the original post on the r-help https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2010-February/227832.html The

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Note that pdf does not 'display' anything: it writes a file. From ?pdf If you see problems with PDF output, do remember that the problem is much more likely to be in your viewer than in R. Try another viewer if possible. ... So which viewers are you using? I see no reason why

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread Ken Knoblauch
Yes, indeed, I had mentioned before this thread had migrated to r-sig-mac https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2010-February/227847.html that there is an interaction with the viewer, because I see a line (though of the wrong width) for a hard copy and display from imageMagick but no

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread David Winsemius
On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Ken Knoblauch wrote: Achim. Indeed, you are right. That is where the problem is. Thanks for helping localize it a bit further. So, I should cc this to the r-sig-mac list. For the r-sig-mac list, here is the original post on the r-help

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread Ken Knoblauch
Thanks. By intended result, do you mean that the dotted line in the viewed pdf file from the short code appeared correctly? which would support the hypothesis that it is something specific to my computer/setup or that it appeared as I had intended the example to demonstrate? in which case, it is

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Ken Knoblauch wrote: Thanks. By intended result, do you mean that the dotted line in the viewed pdf file from the short code appeared correctly? which would support the hypothesis that it is something specific to my computer/setup or that it appeared as I had intended the

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] Sweave, lty = 3 line incorect in pdf output

2010-02-11 Thread Ken Knoblauch
Thanks. OK, I'm beginning to believe that it's specific to my machine, but where to begin to hunt it down? Ken Quoting Thomas Lumley tlum...@u.washington.edu: On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Ken Knoblauch wrote: Thanks. By intended result, do you mean that the dotted line in the viewed pdf file