Re: [R-sig-phylo] Branch and Bound Maximum Parsimony

2011-03-28 Thread David Bapst
Matthew- In addition to Ross's suggestion of TNT, I would recommend that you consider options less commonly used by paleontologists. One option is Mr. Bayes, which can apply the Mk2 model from Lewis (2001) to morphological data. Another is Strataphy (Marcot and Fox, 2008) which can apply

[R-sig-phylo] number of rate categories using fitDiscrete

2011-03-28 Thread Ivan
Dear all, I have been trying to get estimates of transition rates among character states using fitDiscrete in geiger but it returns the following error message: fitDiscrete(tree, h1, model=ARD) Warning: some tree transformations in GEIGER might not be sensible for nonultrametric trees.

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Branch and Bound Maximum Parsimony (Matthew Vavrek)

2011-03-28 Thread Liam J. Revell
Matthew. The only thing that I would add is that if you *really* want to do an exhaustive search in R, and your species number is small enough to permit an exhaustive search (i.e., =10), then it is straightforward enough to do so: require(phangorn)

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Branch and Bound Maximum Parsimony (Matthew Vavrek)

2011-03-28 Thread Klaus Schliep
Thanks Liam, I have two small additions, the first on speeds things up but costs memory, the second one just simplifies things a bit (and is maybe also a bit faster). Regards, Klaus On 3/28/11, Liam J. Revell liam.rev...@umb.edu wrote: Matthew. The only thing that I would add is that if you

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Branch and Bound Maximum Parsimony (Matthew Vavrek)

2011-03-28 Thread Joe Felsenstein
Regarding finding all most parsimonious trees by branch-and-bound: Program Penny in my PHYLIP package could be called from within R, driven by batch scripts. You'd have to make them yourself, but it's not hard. However Penny can handle only 0/1 characters, and if there is a multifurcation it