Re: [R-sig-phylo] How to cluster sequences in different OTUs

2013-03-15 Thread Jombart, Thibaut
Hello, you may have a look at find.clusters (K-means based clustering) and gengraph (transitive graph clusters) in adegenet too. Cheers Thibaut From: r-sig-phylo-boun...@r-project.org [r-sig-phylo-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Sam Brown

[R-sig-phylo] Ancestral state estimates of continuous traits

2013-03-15 Thread Alejandro Gonzalez
Hello, I am using ape to obtain ancestral state estimates for continuous traits. Two options are available, either maximum likelihood or a GLS method. I am comparing the results of both methods and one difference between the two puzzles me, I hope someone can enlighten me. Under GLS the

[R-sig-phylo] Paleobiology/Macroevolution PhD in Oslo: Deadline 15 April 2013

2013-03-15 Thread Lee Hsiang Liow
PhD position available. --- *A 4-YEAR POSITION AS PhD FELLOW IN BIOLOGY (MACROEVOLUTION) **is available atthe Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo.* *Project description* The successful candidate will work with a team

[R-sig-phylo] R course announcement

2013-03-15 Thread Krzysztof Bartoszek
We are happy to announce that the course “Introduction to R for biologists and other students of the natural sciences” will be given again this year in late April and May, funded by the graduate programme Physical Sciences at the University of Gothenburg. The course (3 hp) is an introduction to

Re: [R-sig-phylo] testing for correlates of rates of evolution

2013-03-15 Thread john d
Thank you all for your ideas. I'll probably explore further Liam's method. sincerely, john On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Liam J. Revell liam.rev...@umb.edu wrote: I did a little further exploration of this proposed method - the results discussion are here:

Re: [R-sig-phylo] testing for correlates of rates of evolution

2013-03-15 Thread Rob Lanfear
Hi All, Just a follow up on this. I was thinking about what Liam suggested, and I think it's a different test to what I suggested, but maybe I'm wrong. In particular, Liam's using squared contrasts in y, so that's asking whether the absolute size of changes in y depends on x at the ancestral

Re: [R-sig-phylo] testing for correlates of rates of evolution

2013-03-15 Thread Liam J. Revell
Hi Rob - Regarding your comment: However, I think that this test is not quite the same as asking whether the rate of evolution of y depends on x. For example, it's possible you could (correctly) see a relationship with Liam's test even if there was no relationship between the rate of

Re: [R-sig-phylo] testing for correlates of rates of evolution

2013-03-15 Thread Rob Lanfear
Hi Liam, I think you're right, and I'm wrong. I included the reference below, which I left out of the last email. Rob [1] Freckleton, R.P. (2000) Phylogenetic tests of ecological and evolutionary hypotheses: checking for phylogenetic independence. Funct. Ecol. 14, 129–134 On 16 March 2013

Re: [R-sig-phylo] testing for correlates of rates of evolution

2013-03-15 Thread Joe Felsenstein
Rob Lanfear wrote: In particular, Liam's using squared contrasts in y, so that's asking whether the absolute size of changes in y depends on x at the ancestral node. I might have missed something here, but that sounds very similar in principle to Freckleton's test of whether the