I'm not sure if this is the best place to make a bug report, but I thought
others might be interested.
I was trying to replicate, with geiger, a demonstration of estimating lambda
with measurement error from Liam's blog:
http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/11/including-measurement-error-in.html
Hi all.
If you don't want to apply the fix, you can circumvent the problem by
first assuring that meserr is in the same order as the tree tip labels,
and then removing the names from the input vector of standard errors.
So, for instance:
se-se[tree$tip.label]
names(se)-NULL
