Re: [R-sig-phylo] problem with phylo.toBackbone

2018-02-20 Thread Liam J. Revell
Hi Felipe. Yes, your phytools version is from late 2015 and I added the interactive feature in summer 2016 (http://blog.phytools.org/2016/06/interactive-version-of-phylotobackbone.html). To update all packages you can run (in a fresh R session without any other sessions open):

Re: [R-sig-phylo] problem with phylo.toBackbone

2018-02-20 Thread Liam J. Revell
Hi Felipe. What version of phytools are you using? A very old phytools version did not default to interactive mode if no translation table (trans) was supplied. Otherwise, I do not know - but it should not be because the tree is not ultrametric. All the best, Liam Liam J. Revell,

[R-sig-phylo] problem with phylo.toBackbone

2018-02-20 Thread Felipe Rossetto
Hi everyone, I am using the phylo.toBackbone function of phytools using an ultrametric tree. When I ran the command obj<-phylo.toBackbone(tree), a message ''Error in match(x, table, nomatch = 0L) : argument "trans" is missing, with no default'' appeared. Is the problem related to the fact I used