Good day all,
I noticed something that I would consider an anomaly when analysing one
of my trees with NJ.
A 'polytomy' of samples contained many bootstrap values of 100 between
samples. I was looking at the total change in bootstrap values for all
nodes when I picked this up (as the signal in
Hi Alastair,
it is not that surprising. NJ normally does not produce poytomies,
just edge weights of length 0. How these are broken may depends from
the input order (from labels in the distance matrix like in this
implementation) or could be broken randomly. I added some code below
to highlight i
Klaus Schliep wrote --
> it is not that surprising. NJ normally does not produce poytomies,
> just edge weights of length 0. How these are broken may depends from
> the input order (from labels in the distance matrix like in this
> implementation) or could be broken randomly. I added some code b
Hello all,
I just wanted to let the readers of this list know about a technical session
that may be of general interest, at this year's Geological Society of
America 2011, which will be held in Minneapolis, 9-12 October 2011. This
session, which was proposed by my colleague Emily King and I, will f
Hi Klaus and Joe,
Thanks very much for your responses.
From Klaus:
it is not that surprising. NJ normally does not produce poytomies,
just edge weights of length 0. How these are broken may depends from
the input order (from labels in the distance matrix like in this
implementation) or could be
