Re: [R-sig-phylo] Alllowing and considering "missing data" as values for reconstruction of ancestral character states

2020-04-14 Thread Brian O'Meara
We corresponded with Carolina offline, but here I'm including a generalized solution of the quick solution we just sent her in case it's useful for others (avoiding the issue lampooned in https://xkcd.com/979/). The data was a delimited file with a species column and columns for each character,

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Alllowing and considering "missing data" as values for reconstruction of ancestral character states

2020-04-14 Thread Carolina Santos Vieira
Hi Liam and everyone The numbers from this message "1000 trees with a mapped discrete character with states: 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55" are the same numbers from the nodes on my tree. As I replied to Brian, I assumed

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Alllowing and considering "missing data" as values for reconstruction of ancestral character states

2020-04-14 Thread Liam J. Revell
Hi Carolina. I agree with Brian that a Q matrix in which the elements of a row are all zeros is not likely to be you problem. It just means that the ML estimated transition rate from 1->0, in your case, is zero. I agree with Brian that the message "1000 trees with a mapped discrete