[racket-users] Why doesn't syntax/module-reader work with extra-argument read procedures?

When discussing custom `read` and `read-syntax` implementations, the Racket reference states this in section 1.3.18, Reading via an Extension: > The arity of the resulting procedure determines whether it accepts extra > source-location information: a read procedure accepts either one argument >

[racket-users] Is there a selenium-like lib for racket

Hello everyone, I'm trying to port a python project to racket, but the project uses selenium. I have seen delirium but it no longer seems to be supported for racket. so is there anything similar for racket? Thanks tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [racket-users] Is there a selenium-like lib for racket

Apparently the same team also wrote bindings to Selenium: https://github.com/untyped/selenium The last update was in 2011, though, but it may still be worth a try. Laurent On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:18 AM, timothy george wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to port

[racket-users] DrRacket fill-paragraph?

I know I've pressed meta-q in DrRacket and gotten the Emacs 'fill-paragraph' behavior (where it automatically wraps your text at ~70 characters or so, inserting new-lines, etc) but I can't for the life of me locate any such option/command in either the menus or keybindings list (I'm trying to

Re: [racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

This paper is not about Racket but reports on an r7rs implementation experience and so may have some helpful hints: http://www.schemeworkshop.org/2014/papers/Kato2014.pdf On Oct 25, 2015 5:18 PM, "Alexis King" wrote: > I have built a very small, very incomplete

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket fill-paragraph?

It may be that the shortcut key is shadowed on Linux. Any recommendations for a choice there? Robby On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Andrew Kent wrote: > Yes - that is what I had found previously. But the feature seems absent on > Linux, or else I'm crazy (I just tried in in a

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket fill-paragraph?

Well - the fact that it was m:q on OS X was how I discovered it in the first place (coming from emacs and mindlessly pressing key combinations occasionally, hah). I'm tinkering around in DrRacket on Linux, it doesn't seem to me like m:q (Alt-Q) is bound to anything (with or without 'Enable

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket fill-paragraph?

Yes - that is what I had found previously. But the feature seems absent on Linux, or else I'm crazy (I just tried in in a .scrbl file in OS X and Ubuntu, and it works in OS X, but not Ubuntu). On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:44 PM Robby Findler wrote: > DrRacket has that

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket fill-paragraph?

DrRacket has that when editing scribble files but not other ones. Is that what you found? Robby On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Andrew Kent wrote: > I know I've pressed meta-q in DrRacket and gotten the Emacs > 'fill-paragraph' behavior (where it automatically wraps your text at

Re: [racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

Hello all, I was hoping to get some mailing list assistance with this issue involving adding R7RS's `#u8(...)' bytevector syntax to the readtable: The readtable extension culminates with the following: (with-syntax ([(vals ...) (read-syntax src in)]) (syntax (bytevector vals ...)) (Where

[racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

I have built a very small, very incomplete implementation of R7RS in Racket. You can install the “r7rs” package, or you can find it on GitHub here: https://github.com/lexi-lambda/racket-r7rs Most of the standard seems fairly straightforward, but there are two questions I have. First of all, do