Re: [racket-users] Web server: can't get radio-group formlet to process

Hi Marc, You should change https://github.com/racket/web-server/blob/master/web-server-lib/web-server/formlets/input.rkt#L148 so that if the list is empty, then you return some value that was passed as an extra keyword to `input-group` and `radio-group`. Can you check that and see if it works

Re: [racket-users] Licensing Details (Is there a Runtime Library Exception?)

On 2016-02-12 09:47:44 -0500, Leif Andersen wrote: > > If the intention wasn't to force programs written in racket to be open > > source, then why wasn't an explicit exemption of the runtime libraries > > made, like other projects have? (As stated, like it was done for e.g. GCC > > and Java.) >

Re: [racket-users] Licensing Details (Is there a Runtime Library Exception?)

> yes, I noticed that, but I'm not sure that makes any difference in this case. > If code ends up being JITed together with the runtime libraries during > execution there's no "easy relinking" possible any more. So, if you give me the .zo file that you get when you run `raco make`, I can (at

Re: [racket-users] Licensing Details (Is there a Runtime Library Exception?)

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Leif Andersen wrote: >> If the intention wasn't to force programs written in racket to be open >> source, then why wasn't an explicit exemption of the runtime libraries made, >> like other projects have? (As stated, like it was done for

[racket-users] Re: Call for Google Summer of Code Project Suggestions

Racket -- including a touch-style GUI -- on Android. Please! On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 1:51:00 PM UTC-7, Leif Andersen wrote: > Hello All, > > We are in the process of submitting a Google Summer of Code > application for Racket. If you have an idea for a self contained > project that

Re: [racket-users] Looking for suggestion on accumulating the paths of Graph from HtDP

在 2016年2月1日星期一 UTC+8上午1:41:51，Matthias Felleisen写道： > I think you may wish to read How to Design Programs. Here are something that > are missing: > > — data definitions (what’s a graph? what’s a path) > — signatures > — examples > — tests > > Once you supply those missing pieces, you will

Re: [racket-users] Standardizing the threading macro and organizing packages

On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 1:05:17 PM UTC-5, Alexis King wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2016, at 21:55, Brian Adkins wrote: > > > > Was any consensus reached on this? I've been working through some exercises > > in Racket that a friend is implementing in Elixir, and I just came across a > > "method

Re: [racket-users] Looking for suggestion on accumulating the paths of Graph from HtDP

On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:00 PM, liweijian wrote: > I just added missing parts as follows, it passed all the tests I wrote. Great. Use the force Liweijian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

[racket-users] Debug help with Unix Write

As part of a course I'm in, we had to write a simple bridge simulation that could handle data messages to and from unix ports that have attached to them several hosts. In addition, these bridges have to implement a simple spanning tree algorithm, and send and receive BPDU messages. These

[racket-users] Fwd: Us congress hearing of maan alsaan Money laundry قضية الكونغجرس لغسيل الأموال للمليادير معن الصانع

YouTube videos of U.S. Congress money laundering hearing of Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al sanea" with *bank of America* and The owner of Saad Hospital and Schools in the Eastern Province in *Saudi Arabia* and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Awal Bank in *Bahrain*

Re: [racket-users] Debug help with Unix Write

Unix socket ports are block-buffered, so after writing to them you need to flush the output. Something like (write-json data port) (flush-output port) Your code on github has calls to flush-output without the port argument. That doesn't flush the unix socket port; it flushes the current

[racket-users] Quasisyntax bug?

The expression: (quasisyntax (quote-syntax quasisyntax)) seems to result in an infinite loop. Does anyone know if that's a bug, or expected behavior? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [racket-users] splicing conditional results in the surrounding block?

On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 12:29:04 PM UTC, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-html-template/ This does almost exactly what I was thinking about! Looking at the code makes me go cross-eyed, but if you (expand-once #'(html-template ...)) enough, it turns the SXML

Re: [racket-users] splicing conditional results in the surrounding block?

Nota Poin wrote on 02/12/2016 10:41 PM: This does almost exactly what I was thinking about! Looking at the code makes me go cross-eyed, Yes, I recommend not looking at the code. IIRC, the code is a little icky for a few reasons: 1. It was initially not as clear as I like, just because of

Re: [racket-users] Debug help with Unix Write

On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Ty Coghlan wrote: > As part of a course I'm in, we had to write a simple bridge simulation that > could handle data messages to and from unix ports that have attached to them > several hosts. In addition, these bridges have to implement a

[racket-users] building openwrt .ipk for racket

I dumped onto the Web the files I used to build OpenWrt packages for Racket: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-openwrt/ Neil V. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [racket-users] splicing conditional results in the surrounding block?

On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:26:05 AM UTC, Matthew Butterick wrote: > Of course, you can also use the `at-exp` metalanguage from Scribble to > simplify text-heavy constructions like these, with variables interpolated > into strings: > #lang at-exp racket > > (define (query condA condB

Re: [racket-users] Quasisyntax bug?

Looks like a bug to me. I also narrowed it down, so that it doesn't need the quote-syntax, and I also figured out that it does this before it even expands once, so we know it isn't expanding to itself infinitely or anything like that. So we know it's a loop within the implementation function