Re: [racket-users] aws package fails against google cloud storage

> On Sep 7, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > Isn't there also the option of using the aws pkg at the hash from before the > change to v4? Yes, definitely. (In fact, that’s what I wound up doing, after a git bisect.) I might just fork and branch and

Re: [racket-users] aws package fails against google cloud storage

Isn't there also the option of using the aws pkg at the hash from before the change to v4? Sam On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:23 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users < racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones > wrote: > > > > On

Re: [racket-users] aws package fails against google cloud storage

> On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: > > On 09/06/2016 02:40 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: >> Obvious fixes that I don’t like: >> >> 1) stop using google cloud storage, starting using Amazon S3. >> 2) use the old PLaneT version instead of

Re: [racket-users] aws package fails against google cloud storage

On 09/06/2016 02:40 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: > Obvious fixes that I don’t like: > > 1) stop using google cloud storage, starting using Amazon S3. > 2) use the old PLaneT version instead of the shiny new pkg version. > > Any other suggestions? 3) maybe there's a "google API"

Re: [racket-users] TR + Hash tables -> chaperone errors ?

It's not clear what's going on here without seeing more of the code. A minimal example isn't necessary, just something runnable. Sam On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:31 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: > I’m getting chaperone errors that seem to occur when

[racket-users] TR + Hash tables -> chaperone errors ?

I’m getting chaperone errors that seem to occur when calling a function defined in TR that uses hash-union to construct hash tables from another file. Here’s the text of the error: procedure chaperone: non-chaperone result; received a 2nd argument that is not a chaperone of the original 2nd

Re: [racket-users] Re: lambda and the equivalent define / "defun"

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > > Note that this function still generates a list as output. I suppose it > could instead generate as many values as there are initial elements of xs, > Uh, and you can disregard this statement altogether, since it's

Re: [racket-users] Re: lambda and the equivalent define / "defun"

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > > > ``` > #lang racket/base > > (require racket/match) > > (define (foldl* proc init . xs) > (match xs > ['() init] > [(cons x xs) (apply foldl* proc (proc x init) xs)])) > ``` > > I should provide an example.

Re: [racket-users] Re: lambda and the equivalent define / "defun"

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sanjeev Sharma wrote: > Just illustrates the changing structure (increased nesting depth) on each > recursive call > > The initial call to t2 changes the structure of the > argument/parameter - it puts in a list where there was no list. > >

Re: [racket-users] Re: lambda and the equivalent define / "defun"

Just illustrates the changing structure (increased nesting depth) on each recursive call The initial call to t2 changes the structure of the argument/parameter - it puts in a list where there was no list. Each recursive call from inside t2 again changes the structure, adding an enclosing '()

Re: [racket-users] handin server error

This is a little bit of a hack and weakens the handin server security but adding the following to the top of your checker file should make this error go away: ``` (require handin-server/sandbox) (sandbox-path-permissions (cons (list 'read"/") (sandbox-path-permissions))) ```

Re: [racket-users] TR warning with pict3d-canvas% (in pict3d)

:-( Latest nightly "snapshot 6.6.0.4--2016-09-07(42f4784/a)" still throws the error. Tim On 07/09/16 15:37, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > I think this is fixed in the git repository. Can you try a snapshot build and > see if that works? > > Sam > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:35 AM Tim Brown

[racket-users] TR warning with pict3d-canvas% (in pict3d)

Folks (Neil?), Another type issue, but this time with pict3d. I am trying to use the following code to display a sphere. But there seems to be an issue throwing up a warning. A warning that “will become an error in a future release”. A warning that also seems to be using up a lot of juice to

Re: [racket-users] Re: lambda and the equivalent define / "defun"

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Sanjeev Sharma wrote: > Thanks for joining in. > > The amended question had nothing to do with the earlier example > Okay. > > I'm wondering if there's a quick, standard (and easily understood) idiom > (without an internal helper function)

Re: [racket-users] typed/racket/gui : possible bug in slider%.get-value

Thanks for noticing this! The type of `get-value` was wrong, probably due to reading `position-integer?` in the docs as `positive-integer?`, or something like that. I'll push a repair. Sam On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Tim Brown wrote: > The following code produces a

Re: [racket-users] Re: lambda and the equivalent define / "defun"

Thanks for joining in. The amended question had nothing to do with the earlier example I'm wondering if there's a quick, standard (and easily understood) idiom (without an internal helper function) to recur on the variable argument list y The flatten's not ideal - I may want to retain some

[racket-users] typed/racket/gui : possible bug in slider%.get-value

The following code produces a contract error; I think TR is making assumptions that it probably shouldn’t be. Please could someone investigate. Thanks, Tim ;;; #lang typed/racket/gui (define f (new frame% [label "Frame"])) (define

Re: [racket-users] Racket module creation in org-mode?

Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean. You can use the module form to define more than one module in a file. There is also the sub-modules functionality. Both are documented at https://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/Module_Syntax.html#%28part._module-syntax%29 Kind regards Stephen On Tue,

Re: [racket-users] aws package fails against google cloud storage

> On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Greg Hendershott > wrote: > > Until this thread today, I wasn't even aware the AWS package could be > used with GCS. > > It was a fair amount of work to update things to use v4 sig a year ago: > >