[racket-users] where to put this ordinary least squares code?

So: you want to perform ordinary least squares linear regression. I’ve needed this code a bunch of times, and the matrix library actually suggests that something like this might be useful, but I my implementation technique is “transliterate from wikipedia,” and I have a strong suspicion that a

Re: [racket-users] implementing make in racket

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 1:49:04 PM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I just pushed a fix for this, btw. > > Awesome, thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [racket-users] implementing make in racket

I just pushed a fix for this, btw. Jay On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote: > > The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code > > assumes the job is

Re: [racket-users] implementing make in racket

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote: > The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code > assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should > protect itself from job exceptions. > Probably a good idea. I got confused

Re: [racket-users] hyperlink in code:comment

Each code formatting form, like `racketblock`, allows specifying an escape identifier for use within that form, though all forms default to `unsyntax` if unspecified, I believe. Some forms, like `codeblock` do not support escapes. The docs here [1] has more details, and specifically the docs for

Re: [racket-users] implementing make in racket

The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should protect itself from job exceptions. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:30:08

Re: [racket-users] implementing make in racket

On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:30:08 PM UTC-8, David K. Storrs wrote: > > Can you simply catch it and handle it inside the thunk? >   That's probably best. I was looking at the machinery to serialize exceptions in type racket* and thinking I needed that *:

Re: [racket-users] Plot multiple lines from data set

Hi Stephen, Renderers are values, so you could simply define each one separately, then build the list, then pass it to plot. No need for macros. (define line1 ) (define line2 ) (define all-lines (list line1 line2 )) (plot all-lines) Vincent On

[racket-users] Plot multiple lines from data set

Hi, I'm trying to work out how I can include multiple datasets in a single plot. (plot (list (function) ...)) works, Should I write a macro that creates an enormous plot statement? Is there another way to build the list of renderers? I've attached my example Kind regards, Stephen -- Kind

Re: [racket-users] Scribble equivalent of rowspan

Hi Philip, There's nothing like rowspan currently. If you want to try adding something, I think you'll end up changing the "scribble-lib" package in several places: in "core.rkt" to adjust the contract for tables, in "base.rkt" to adjust the contract for `tabular`, and in "html-render.rkt",