On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:26:11PM +, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> >
> > I often look up documentation on my phone while using my computer
> > for coding. Otherwise I'd have to get my laptop to talk to two
> > screens, and it's just not up to that.
>
>
> Don't you find the documentation
Hi all!
TL;DR: if you're struggling when debugging scopes, I wrote a couple of
utilities to help: (+scopes stx) shows the scopes in a readable manner,
(print-full-scopes) gives a summary of these scopes, and (make-named-scope
string-or-symbol) creates a fresh scope
Is it the CRC mentioned in this article?
http://www.drdobbs.com/implementing-the-ccitt-cyclical-redundan/199904926
s.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:54 PM, wrote:
> Hi Racketeers,
>
> Does anyone have a CRC-16-CCITT implementation in Racket? I didn't see it
> in the pkgs
Run `raco pkg install sxml` and use `(require sxml)`.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Robert Kirkpatrick <
robert.kirkpatrick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Newbie question:
> I can't find a way to install a sxml pkg (require (planet sxml))
> TIA,
> Robert.
>
> --
> You received this message because you
Newbie question:
I can't find a way to install a sxml pkg (require (planet sxml))
TIA,
Robert.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
For those interested, and for myself later, an answer came in over IRC.
Hi All, Does anyone know of a Racket CRC library? I didn't see it
in pkgs, wanted to check real quick before implementing it myself -- I need
the CRC 16 CCITT.
...
jerryj: there is this old one:
Hi Racketeers,
Does anyone have a CRC-16-CCITT implementation in Racket? I didn't see it in
the pkgs site, I thought someone might have an unpublished version they might
like to share.
Thanks,
Jerry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users"
Thanks Robby! -J
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> There may be a way to do this without it, but I've just pushed a
> change to define-module-boundary-contract that lets you specify the
> name that you want in the error message.
>
> Also, if
There may be a way to do this without it, but I've just pushed a
change to define-module-boundary-contract that lets you specify the
name that you want in the error message.
Also, if you can use a `let`, that's probably better than procedure-rename, eg:
(define make-bar
(let ([bar (λ (x [y 1]
9 matches
Mail list logo