Thank you. The direct approach worked. While I really do want to learn about
custodians, I’ll leave that for another day.
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Probably the more direct path in this case is to call
> `application-quit-handler` to install
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this changed. To get a #t with equal? you can add
> #:transparent . But be careful because #:transparent is more powerful
> than what I expected. For example, it makes available the constructor
> of
I'm not sure if this changed. To get a #t with equal? you can add
#:transparent . But be careful because #:transparent is more powerful
than what I expected. For example, it makes available the constructor
of the struct.
#lang racket
(define-struct foo (a b))
(make-foo 3 4) ; ==>
Probably the more direct path in this case is to call
`application-quit-handler` to install a callback for when the "Quit"
menu item is selected, and the callback could call `(exit)`.
At Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:51:17 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Run your app’s threads in a custodian, and
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 12:33:46 PM UTC-7, lu wrote:
> In fact, I'm wondering if `raco distribute` or `raco exe` is flexible enough
> to produce a statically linked executable where all the necessary dlls are
> incorporated.
I believe this is possible, but probably not worth the effort
Run your app’s threads in a custodian, and make sure to shut down this
custodian when you discover that the user has clicked on any ‘quit button’.
Something like
(class frame%
(super-new)
(inherit move resize)
(define/augment (on-close)
I successfully built a Mac app, called BlackSwan, using raco exe and raco
distribute. I was able to distribute it to beta testers and it worked
perfectly — until the user tries to quit out of it. I haven’t added any menus
to the app, but it comes up with a BlackSwan menu with About,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Rusi Mody wrote:
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 9:46:53 PM UTC+5:30, David K. Storrs
> wrote:
> > I find PP to be a useful tool for thinking about programming, but not
> terribly significant in everyday use -- my code will typically
Thank you Matthias,
It seems that you all have developed a well structured path of programming
experience for beginners. Great! Coding can be somewhat therapeutic, i
start to think so.
I'll check (and complain later :)
Good day everyone !
On Feb 21, 2017 15:32, "Matthias Felleisen"
You can also, as you pointed out, generate the string programmatically. If
you do, you'll get mileage out of the string-upcase and string-downcase
functions:
(define basestr (string-join (map string-downcase '(...jpg jpeg etc)) ";")
(define str (string-append basestr ";" (string-upcase
Dear Linh Chi,
the exercise is basically Lab 7 from the last instance of the Northeastern
beginners course:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/course/cs2500f16/lab7.html
If you work through this lab, you will get a performant solution based on
lists. Once you have that, it should be fairly obvious
hello,
i'm doing this exercise and would appreciate any comments. i want to create a
machine to scan a text, then split the text into elements (storing in a hash
table). then we connect these hash keys in a probabilistic way, so that if we
start from a word, we can jump to other words in a
12 matches
Mail list logo