On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 8:46:54 PM UTC+3, Piyush Katariya wrote:
> Does Racket app make use of all CPU cores by having multiple processes ?
Thanks for asking this question. It prompted me to revise how the benchmark is
run. The short answer is that the servlet application uses a single
Yes, it's effectively in words (so 8 bytes on a 64-bit platform, 4
bytes on a 32-bit platform), since the count refers to Racket values
that are represented by pointers.
You can set the value to be a small as you want, since the stack is
grown as needed, but even the simplest program will need a
Empirically it seems to be 8-byte words?
Unless I made a mistake:
#lang at-exp racket/base
(require racket/format)
(define (current-custodian-memory-use)
(for ([_ (in-range 3)]) (collect-garbage))
(current-memory-use (current-custodian)))
(define (f v)
What is the unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value ? Is it in KB ?
what is recommended minimum value ?
I did not find any page on Racket official doc to get this info so asking here.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To
OSM Map link for The Swan & Castle:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.75119=-1.26185#map=18/51.75120/-1.26212
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 11:04:16 UTC+1, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> For anyone who can make the trip to Oxford, we'll be at the Swan & Castle at
> 6:30pm on Monday. We hope to see
For anyone who can make the trip to Oxford, we'll be at the Swan & Castle at
6:30pm on Monday. We hope to see you there!
Matthew
> On Aug 27, 2017, at 8:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>
> HI — we compared constraints with Matthew B. (London) to coordinate but we
>
A time ago i have implemented a minimal fastcgi protocol and compare it
against various others implementations.
http://antoineb.github.io/blog/2015/06/02/basic-fastcgi-with-racket/
On 09/02/2017 10:12 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
dbohdan wrote on 09/02/2017 03:12 PM:
I rather like the SCGI
7 matches
Mail list logo