Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket Web servlet performance benchmarked and compared

2017-09-03 Thread dbohdan
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 8:46:54 PM UTC+3, Piyush Katariya wrote: > Does Racket app make use of all CPU cores by having multiple processes ? Thanks for asking this question. It prompted me to revise how the benchmark is run. The short answer is that the servlet application uses a single

Re: [racket-users] unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew Flatt
Yes, it's effectively in words (so 8 bytes on a 64-bit platform, 4 bytes on a 32-bit platform), since the count refers to Racket values that are represented by pointers. You can set the value to be a small as you want, since the stack is grown as needed, but even the simplest program will need a

Re: [racket-users] unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value

2017-09-03 Thread Greg Hendershott
Empirically it seems to be 8-byte words? Unless I made a mistake: #lang at-exp racket/base (require racket/format) (define (current-custodian-memory-use) (for ([_ (in-range 3)]) (collect-garbage)) (current-memory-use (current-custodian))) (define (f v)

[racket-users] unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value

2017-09-03 Thread Piyush Katariya
What is the unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value ? Is it in KB ? what is recommended minimum value ? I did not find any page on Racket official doc to get this info so asking here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

Re: [racket-users] European Racketeers and conferences

2017-09-03 Thread Chris Gallagher
OSM Map link for The Swan & Castle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.75119=-1.26185#map=18/51.75120/-1.26212 On Sunday, 3 September 2017 11:04:16 UTC+1, Matthew Flatt wrote: > For anyone who can make the trip to Oxford, we'll be at the Swan & Castle at > 6:30pm on Monday. We hope to see

Re: [racket-users] European Racketeers and conferences

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew Flatt
For anyone who can make the trip to Oxford, we'll be at the Swan & Castle at 6:30pm on Monday. We hope to see you there! Matthew > On Aug 27, 2017, at 8:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > > HI — we compared constraints with Matthew B. (London) to coordinate but we >

Re: [racket-users] Racket Web servlet performance benchmarked and compared

2017-09-03 Thread antoine
A time ago i have implemented a minimal fastcgi protocol and compare it against various others implementations. http://antoineb.github.io/blog/2015/06/02/basic-fastcgi-with-racket/ On 09/02/2017 10:12 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: dbohdan wrote on 09/02/2017 03:12 PM: I rather like the SCGI