> If order to use a struct across namespaces, the module that
> defines the struct must be required into each namespace that uses the
> struct.
Yes, I suspect there's some weird interaction between namespaces too, hence
the topic, but that's still pretty vague. After all, the thing defining
Truly excellent news! Can’t wait to hear about it at the next RacketCon.
John
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 14:46, Christopher Lemmer Webber
> wrote:
>
> I've mentioned that my goal has been to advance the
> federated/decentralized social web in Racket on here before. Here's
> some news:
>
>
>
Thank you for your efforts and stamina in pursuit of this goal. I hope that
Samsung will continue to be generous to you :)
Congrats! — Matthias
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 5:46 PM, Christopher Lemmer Webber
> wrote:
>
> I've mentioned that my goal has been to advance the
>
Fantastic!
Congratulations to you, federation and to Racket =)
G.
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 11:46:49 PM UTC+1, cwebber wrote:
>
> I've mentioned that my goal has been to advance the
> federated/decentralized social web in Racket on here before. Here's
> some news:
>
>
>
As long as the user-scripts won't be lost (i.e. the scripts will be copied
over) it sounds OK.
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 10:42:08 PM UTC+1, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> Probably it is best if quickscript (either silently or after asking)
> copied scripts from a version-specific directory to
Congrats!
Robby
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:46 PM Christopher Lemmer Webber
wrote:
>
> I've mentioned that my goal has been to advance the
> federated/decentralized social web in Racket on here before. Here's
> some news:
>
>
>
I've mentioned that my goal has been to advance the
federated/decentralized social web in Racket on here before. Here's
some news:
https://samsungnext.com/whats-next/category/podcasts/decentralization-samsung-next-stack-zero-grant-recipients/
I'm being funded for the next two years to work
I see that there is the local-expand/capture-lifts and
syntax-local-lift-expression for expressions, but is there a way to lift
bindings as well? ... something akin to local-expand/capture-lift-defines
maybe ...
Basically I want to rewrite a syntax so any (MyDefine ...) is lifted into a
Probably it is best if quickscript (either silently or after asking)
copied scripts from a version-specific directory to a new
(version-specific) one, much like how the pkg system works.
Robby
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:38 PM Greg Trzeciak wrote:
>
> I had quickscript already installed when
I had quickscript already installed when upgrading Racket.
On DrRacket startup I got the following error:
Error in script file "run-in-interactions.rkt": read-compiled-linklet:
version mismatch
expected: "7.2"
found: "6.90.0.24"
in:
After updating to 7.2, I got this message after trying to use the "copy
from version" menu option in the package manager to restore my packages
from 7.1, due to quickscript being added to the standard distribution. This
seems like it should be a simple enough issue to address, but I was unable
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:39:19PM -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> Is xexprs really maintained either? At any rate, not all software needs
> very active maintenance; sxml seems to be fairly stable. Maybe you
> disagree. :)
>
> At any rate, I don't think xexprs support namespaces,
On 1/31/2019 10:58 AM, hashim muqtadir wrote:
The test in my following code raises an error saying that when I call
select/f, the result doesn't satisfy `sql-statement?`.
I've no idea why, the only vague idea I have is that it may have
something to do with the fact that it was essentially
Stability is narrower than maintainability, which includes the idea of "can the
software be improved to suit current needs".
For instance: I'd be willing to look into adding SXML conversion functions to
my `txexpr` package if you'd find them useful. But when I try to read Oleg's
spec for
Hi,
> [2] http://pobox.com/~oleg/ftp/Scheme/SXML.html
moved to http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/SXML.html
Kind regards,
Stephen
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 17:39, Christopher Lemmer Webber <
cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> Is xexprs really maintained either? At any rate, not all software needs
> very
First off, many thanks for bringing to my attention the fact that Ryan has
started racket-izing SQL! And thanks, Ryan, for racket-izing SQL! Maybe I can
stop stapling together all of those long horrible strings now.
Next, to answer your question, I believe that eval is not necessary here, and
Is xexprs really maintained either? At any rate, not all software needs
very active maintenance; sxml seems to be fairly stable. Maybe you
disagree. :)
At any rate, I don't think xexprs support namespaces, which sxml has
tooling for, which is one important thing.
Matthew Butterick writes:
> I
I (ab)use xexprs for Pollen because they're used in the Racket web server, and
because at the time, SXML seemed largely abandoned — no traffic on its mailing
list [1] and today, even Oleg's SXML page is a 404. [2]
I wouldn't try to pry SXML from anyone's fingers. But dragging around
> On Jan 30, 2019, at 8:52 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
>> Although there are costs to TR in compile time and load time,
>> especially in a program that also has untyped components, I generally
>> would not recommend moving away from TR.
>
> Unlike Matthew, I can be sure not to offend the
Hi
I’ve done a little wiki gardening on the github Racket wiki on the main
racket repository on the grounds that GitHub is arguably the dominant
social network for developers, and likely the first place many developers
will see your code.
Please take a quick look and correct any mistakes:
Thank you for all the hard work you've put into this, everyone.
The benchmark graphs are impressive! One thing that surprised me is
that there are a handful of tests (tak1, dynamic2, tak, mazefun,
maze2, collatz-q, collatz) where Racket/CS actually outperformed CS.
How is that possible?
On Thu,
Hello,
The test in my following code raises an error saying that when I call
select/f, the result doesn't satisfy `sql-statement?`.
I've no idea why, the only vague idea I have is that it may have something
to do with the fact that it was essentially eval'd in a separate namespace.
Any ideas?
Just wanted to say thank you for the update and for the honest report.
I look forward to using Racket CS, and to seeing how easily new features
can be incorporated :)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:49 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Here's a new status report on Racket CS:
>
>
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 9:23:39 AM UTC+8, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> > I would be happy to help you identify where the performance degradation
> > between Racket 7.1 and CS is when running these tests.
>
> Small examples that illustrate slowness in a specific subsystem are
> always
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 1:56 AM Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
> I actually migrated code from SXML to xexpr in order to be able to use
> Pollen.
For me, it feels like SXML is really optimized for consuming XML and
xexpr is really optimized for producing it.
Jay
--
-=[ Jay McCarthy
Vincent St-Amour writes:
> Racket version 7.2 is now available from
>
> http://racket-lang.org/
>
> Racket-on-Chez is done in a useful sense, but we'll wait until it gets
> better before making it the default Racket implementation. For more
> information, see
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
