Re: [racket-users] Re: R7RS

2019-05-26 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Thank you, amz3.  This is exactly what I needed.  (I should've realized that same question would've been on the minds of the R7RS writers, and read the friendly manual.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this

[racket-users] outreach reddit /r/learnprogramming

2019-05-26 Thread Neil Van Dyke
If you want an interesting place to do outreach for Racket, `/r/learnprogramming` has almost a million subscribers, and a search suggests that questions about Racket (and criticisms) tend to go unanswered: https://old.reddit.com/r/learnprogramming/

[racket-users] Re: R7RS

2019-05-26 Thread amz3
Hello Neil, On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 12:53:23 AM UTC+2, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > Does anyone know of a summary of R7RS-Small changes relative to R5RS > (not relative to R6RS)? > > (I'm aware of > "http://andykeep.com/SchemeWorkshop2015/papers/sfpw1-2015-clinger.pdf;, > which addresses a

Re: [racket-users] redundancy in GUI callback functions

2019-05-26 Thread Travis Hinkelman
Ah, well, that was more straightforward than I expected. I was lazy with my Saturday-night learning session and didn't push very hard to solve it on my own. Thank you for taking the time to help. I also appreciate that you caught those bugs and improved the code style. Thanks again. On