If anyone is following along here, I recently installed the Racket 7.4
(non-Chez Scheme) version from the Ubuntu PPA and this performance has been
acceptable. It is slightly noticeably slower but much better than what I
had seen in 7.3. This works for me, but I am still clueless in
Unless your objective is to learn C and SDL, I would recommend writing the
game entirely in Racket and using the Racket graphics facilities -- you
will find that the performance will be more than enough for a roguelike
game that you want to develop. Also, there are more people that can help
Ok, thanks.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 4:16 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:06:14 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > > It depends on `process-file`. If `process-file` retains `msg` until it
> > > is otherwise done, then yes. But if
At Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:06:14 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > It depends on `process-file`. If `process-file` retains `msg` until it
> > is otherwise done, then yes. But if `process-file` ignores the argument
> > for `msg` or only uses it for the
(provide fish%) ought to work. Classes created with racket/class are
values, just like numbers, strings, and functions, so you can provide them
like you would other values.
On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 1:09:40 PM UTC-7, Tim Meehan wrote:
>
> Say for instance, I have a class in
Say for instance, I have a class in "tastyfish.rkt"
#lang racket
(require racket/class)
; What `provide` statement would I put here so that another module
; (like "market.rkt" for instance) can require fish%?
(define fish%
(class object%
(super-new)
(init size)
(define
[[NOTE: "Rhombus" is the new name for a design project formerly known
as "Racket2", but "Rhombus" IS NOT THE FINAL NAME OF THE NEW LANGUAGE.
"Rhombus" is the name of the project that will develop a language,
and "Rhombus" is a temporary stand-in for a language name to be
determined later.
This is fantastic news! Thank you!
Stephen Chang writes:
> The RacketScript compiler [1] has been updated to work with Racket 7.x
> programs, ie all tests pass (though we are still working to support
> more primitives).
>
> Try it out here: http://rapture.twistedplane.com:8080/
>
> The next
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:53:46PM -0400, Stephen Chang wrote:
> The RacketScript compiler [1] has been updated to work with Racket 7.x
> programs, ie all tests pass (though we are still working to support
> more primitives).
>
> Try it out here: http://rapture.twistedplane.com:8080/
>
> The
The RacketScript compiler [1] has been updated to work with Racket 7.x
programs, ie all tests pass (though we are still working to support
more primitives).
Try it out here: http://rapture.twistedplane.com:8080/
The next milestone is to improve RacketScript enough to compile the
Racket expander
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:52:05 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> > ; main dispatcher loop in the server. Receives messages, dispatches
> > to child thread for processing
>
> > 2) This WOULD work:
> > (let loop ()
> > (define msg
This is a hobby project of mine - a game in C, using SDL. I'd like to only
use C for the rendering part - rather use a scripting language for all of
the gameplay code. I want to try to use Racket for this - I've been doing
enough Clojure that I'm familiar with a lisp. My first approach was to
At Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:52:05 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> ; main dispatcher loop in the server. Receives messages, dispatches
> to child thread for processing
> (struct file-info (hash) #:transparent)
> (define channels (make-weak-hash))
> (let loop ()
> (define msg (get-next-message)) ;
Hi All,
As the Slack users already know, I have created a little web-site to share
interesting stories/links/blogs/packages/papers on everything
Racket-related.
https://racket-stories.com
Click "submit" to submit your own stories.
/Jens Axel
--
You received this message because you are
String constants:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/string-constants/index.html
https://github.com/racket/string-constants
I agree they do not support plurals and context, which should mean it would
be possible to convert the s-expressions (of Racker messages, not the
general case) to po-file
What is racket's own one? srfi-29? String-constants?
Neither of them support plurals and contexts. Or do you mean something else?
вторник, 1 октября 2019 г., 16:06:35 UTC+5 пользователь Alexander Shopov
написал:
>
> We should be able to convert to and from po format to racket's own one.
>
> На
16 matches
Mail list logo
