> On Feb 23, 2020, at 18:28, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> None of Racket BC, Racket CS, or Chez Scheme by itself will optimize
> away the unused loop argument. That kind of interprocedural dead-code
> elimination is out of reach for the current compilers, except to the
> degree that inlining turns th
Some minor remarks:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 9:58 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> [Replying to three messages]
>
> At Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:05:28 -0800, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> > 1) As a package maintainer with zero exposure to Chez Scheme, how do I
> start
> > to optimize for Racket CS? Are there cer
Is anyone up for another racket meet-up in London ?
Need to work out a time and place to meet.
Kind regards
Stephen
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s
Try this case-> type instead:
(case->
(-> Integer 'name Symbol)
(-> Integer 'age Integer)
(-> Integer Symbol (U Symbol Integer)))
I don't know what it would take to add refinements for symbols, but
that might be useful. Andrew Kent's dissertation may have some
pointers:
https://pn
Hello,
I'm using the wonderful graph library which can do tons of various
graph-related tasks. However, I haven't found a way to attach
non-numerical weights/labels to edges _and_ have them appear in the
Graphviz rendering of the graph.
Is it at all possible?
I did see define-edge-property,
[Replying to three messages]
At Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:05:28 -0800, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> 1) As a package maintainer with zero exposure to Chez Scheme, how do I start
> to optimize for Racket CS? Are there certain patterns and idioms from BC that
> should be systematically eradicated?
No. Fo
6 matches
Mail list logo
