On 5/10/2021 8:16 PM, Don Green wrote:
From Racket doc: "File permissions are transferred from src to dest;
on Windows, the modification time of src is also transferred to dest."
Is the above line meant to imply that a unix/linux version of Racket
will NOT preserve file attributes using
>From Racket doc: "File permissions are transferred from src to dest; on
Windows, the modification time of src is also transferred to dest."
Is the above line meant to imply that a unix/linux version of Racket will
NOT preserve file attributes using copy-file?
--
You received this message
Racket documentation claims that copy-file preserves attributes but I find
that this is not the case. The destination file date is the current date,
not the source file date.
Comments?
Don
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To
I hope so! That's what I understood option B to mean.
I could adjust the define-message macro according to the info in Ryan and
Phillip's attachments, but I'm not well-educated on trapping struct operations.
Phillip: Your example and email gives me the impression that when you add a
chaperone,
On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 10:23:34PM +, Sage Gerard wrote:
> I have a project with 57 prefab structure types. I need to construct
> instances using a local contract (module level contracts do not fit my needs
> here). Since I cannot define guards, the solution is easy enough.
>
> (struct foo
5 matches
Mail list logo
