> Wouldn't people asking to be invited be pretty much the same moderation
> burden as option 3, but with less support? I guess that's a way of saying I
> lean to option 3.
I see what you mean. I saw "invite-only" as the option with the most
discretionary effort when volunteers are scarce,
Sage Gerard writes:
> All,
>
> I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the spammer.
> I want to hear from others before I touch anything.
>
Thanks for putting effort into this.
> I've been informed that an invite-only approach might not be appropriate, but
> without
Jens answered your question, but I'll note two convenient shorthands:
> #lang racket
> (require racket/format)
racket/format is provided by #lang racket, so you can skip that.
This:
(define fp
(lambda (s n)
(string-append (pp_number n) " + " s)))
is the same as this:
(define (fp s n)
Try reversing the order for arguments for both fp and f.
/Jens Axel
Den tir. 14. dec. 2021 kl. 19.48 skrev Cyrille DEUSS <
cyrille.de...@gmail.com>:
> #lang racket
> (require racket/format)
>
> (define pp_number
> (lambda (n)
> (~a n #:width 6 #:align 'right #:left-pad-string "0")))
>
>
#lang racket
(require racket/format)
(define pp_number
(lambda (n)
(~a n #:width 6 #:align 'right #:left-pad-string "0")))
(define fp
(lambda (s n)
(string-append (pp_number n) " + " s)))
(define f
(lambda (s n)
(format "~a + ~a" n s)))
(foldl f "" '(1 2 3))
; works great !
Correction: "Invited users only" does have a moderation requirement, but I
expect it is not the kind that requires daily interruption.
On 12/14/21 1:28 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> All,
>
> I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the spammer.
> I want to hear from others
All,
I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the spammer. I
want to hear from others before I touch anything.
The spams continues because moderation is outright disabled for the list. Our
other choices are to apply moderation to non-group members only, or everybody.
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
