Re: [racket-users] Racket language for enterprise software

вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 9:46, Madhav Peshwa : > > Hi all, > I am reading the book Htdp and learning Racket and enjoying. I would like to > know Racket usage in enterprise(read software in java!) I can see there are > great packages for json/http etc. How does it compare with java based >

Re: [racket-users] Beautiful Racket v1.0

2017-03-16 3:28 GMT+03:00 Matthew Butterick : > I'm very pleased to announce that Beautiful Racket, my book about making > languages with Racket (that I spoke about at the last RacketCon) is now > officially released: > > http://beautifulracket.com > > Special thanks to chief

Re: [racket-users] Narrow radix of string->number.

>> Why restricting it to 36? > > > I guess that the original poster implied 10 digits + 26 Latin letters for > notation. True. And this notation is used in standard numeric conversion functions in C, C++ and Common Lisp. So, I think it's reasonable to use it in Racket. -- You received this

[racket-users] Narrow radix of string->number.

Hello, Why the radix of string->number is narrowed to (2 16)? Shouldn't it be (2 36)? There is a real need for it. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [racket-users] racket-mode: OK to require Racket 6.0+?

Hi Greg, Yes, please! Racket mode for Emacs is great. Thank you for you work! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[racket-users] Typo in license.html.

Hello, I've noticed a typo at https://download.racket-lang.org/license.html - a double "for for" here: "We have chosen the LGPL as the license for Racket, which makes it possible for for" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

Re: [racket-users] continuing after a user break

2015-07-28 1:48 GMT+03:00 John Carmack jo...@oculus.com: Any chance that could make it in as a DrRacket feature? Btw, this question is a valuable reason why I love Lisp and Emacs -- it's possible to implement almost any desired feature on one's own without waiting from vendor ;) -- // Dmitry.

Re: [racket-users] What limits would you put on racket?

2015-07-24 2:48 GMT+03:00 Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org: On Racket, CL, limits, programmers... I've found that most stuff can be done in Racket, and, though I have used CL when required by two consulting clients' prior implementation choices, I'm not aware that CL has any key advantages

[racket-users] Emacs Racket.

Hello, Is there are cool Emacs mode (such as SLIME for Common Lisp) for Racket? Also, AFAIK as of 6.1.1 there are drracket-tool-lib. So, does anybody used it for build mode for Emacs? Thanks. -- // Dmitry. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Racket

[racket-users] Re: Emacs Racket.

2015-07-15 22:47 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com: Hello, Is there are cool Emacs mode (such as SLIME for Common Lisp) for Racket? Oops, sorry for noise, there are Geiser. But still curios about using drracket-tool-lib. Thanks. -- // Dmitry. -- You received this message