Re: [racket-users] Do I need macros to flag unbound identifiers as failing unit tests?

This is great feedback, thank you both so much! I like using a language for this approach as the project evolves, and You's feedback is a good stopgap that does work, and can be applied in-place. On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 1:01 PM Matthew Butterick wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2018, at 9:00 AM

[racket-users] Do I need macros to flag unbound identifiers as failing unit tests?

Hi all, Still working the koans project and am hitting a design snag. My expected UX is that you clone the repo, run racket koans/all.rkt, and then see nothing but failing unit tests for you to fix. But since some exercises have unbound module identifiers

Re: [racket-users] Using ->i to allow only valid Sneetches for the McBean machine

gt;> (not demand]) >> (result (demand inputs) >> (and/c >> (non-empty-listof (and/c boolean? (curry boolean=? demand))) >> (compose (curry = (length inputs)) length >> (map (lambda (s) stars-upon-thars?) sneetches)

[racket-users] Seeking expert opinion on how Racketeering tames web development chaos.

Hi! New to Racket. Looking for expert opinion on my question, but I should give some background. I worked on software for about 11 years. Started on Win32 desktop applications with C++ and then eventually moved to web, where I stayed on front-end development for about 6 years. Moved to

<    1   2   3