Thanks for the reply I read that thing about the error handling on a forum but found it later in another location
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/icfp10-cf.pdf > <olin shivers quote> > > In other words, adding error-checking > to the loop macro is expected to double the size of the > code. Using syntax-parse we can do better. The original > loop macro performs little error checking; in thirtytwo > exported macros there are only three syntax validation > checks plus a handful of internal sanity checks. The > exported macros consist of the loop macro itself plus > thirty-one CPS macros [Hilsdale and Friedman 2000] for loop > clauses such as for and do. > > CPS macros pose challenges for generating good erro So it looks like Ryan Culpepper has a racket version? I didn't see anything obvious on his github account. On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 6:32:43 AM UTC-4, Sanjeev Sharma wrote: > anyone have a working implemntation? > > Just a little while ago I read something to the effect that Shivers thought > error handling would be a huge mess but there's a Racket implementation that > does a lot of error handling cheaply. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
