On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 18:10:31 -0500
Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
> It is rare that I have to somewhat-contradict Matthew here, but so it
> goes.
:-)
> Use Racket for what you have in mind. It’s obviously the superior
> language :-)
That makes the deal. Thank you very much for your input as well
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 18:24:47 -0500
Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Yes, I did another look for Racket last year, and desktop GUI toolkit
> options generally seem to have have actually gotten fewer and worse
> since the move of most of the money to Web and handheld apps.
Yes, very sad. :-(
> We need to
Matthias Felleisen writes:
> It is rare that I have to somewhat-contradict Matthew here, but so it goes.
>
> One of my colleagues, Jan Vitek, has studied Julia with a special
> focus on performance. As many have said, Julia is good at numerics
> because its compiler can specialize certain cases
Gour wrote on 2/2/19 3:55 PM:
Many languages simply do not pass 'GUI criteria' and, imho, Racket is very much
deprived of its glory by providing first class GUI option for all those not so
enamored with JS/browser stuff.
Yes, I did another look for Racket last year, and desktop GUI toolkit
It is rare that I have to somewhat-contradict Matthew here, but so it goes.
One of my colleagues, Jan Vitek, has studied Julia with a special focus on
performance. As many have said, Julia is good at numerics because its compiler
can specialize certain cases really well. More generally, it
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 08:04:36 -0700
Matthew Flatt wrote:
> It's possible that the someone talked to me. I recall offering the
> opinion to someone at RacketCon/ICFP/StrangeLoop that Racket would not
> be as fast as Julia for the case that Julia is designed for ---
> specifically numerics --- due
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 04:53:33 -0500
Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> That's an unusual shortlist of candidates.
Well, yes and no. Many languages simply do not pass 'GUI criteria' and, imho,
Racket is very much deprived of its glory by providing first class GUI option
for all those not so enamored with
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 01:41:17 -0800 (PST)
Yvan Godin wrote:
> I have played with Julia as a language it's a good compromise between Common
> Lisp with Python syntax and C performance
>
> but build an autonomous prog. come with a lot of pain
That's good to know. Thank you!
> their Gtk is far to
Hello
I have played with Julia
as a language it's a good compromise between Common Lisp with Python syntax
and C performance
but build an autonomous prog. come with a lot of pain
Racket come with an excellent battery include
Julia is based on LLVM witch is very very big
Julia provide a real
9 matches
Mail list logo
