Ah, you're right. I'm still acclimated to BC here. Disregard!
On 5/14/21 7:30 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Sage Gerard writes:
>
>> I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
>> be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
>> when that language
Sage Gerard writes:
> I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
> be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
> when that language can freely ignore the Racket printer and write
> directly to STDOUT within the same operating system process.
Jon Zeppieri writes:
> Can you use BinaryenModuleWriteText instead? It looks like it was
> added to address your use case. -J
Good point and nice catch.
Although it doesn't solve the issue with racket it does provide a way
out for me to create a safe binding for this function that works
Can you use BinaryenModuleWriteText instead? It looks like it was
added to address your use case. -J
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:49 AM Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a shared library for which I am creating some bindings:
> https://github.com/pmatos/racket-binaryen
>
> There's a function
I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
when that language can freely ignore the Racket printer and write
directly to STDOUT within the same operating system process.
I'd hate to just add a "me
Hi,
I have a shared library for which I am creating some bindings:
https://github.com/pmatos/racket-binaryen
There's a function BinaryenModulePrint that prints a WebAssembly module
to stdout.
When I wrap it in racket, if I do something like:
(define mod ...)
(with-output-to-string (lambda ()
6 matches
Mail list logo
