Suppose I have a macro (experiment ...) which is intended, among other things,
to be composed of uses of a macro (collect ...).
For instance:
(experiment
(collect ...)
(collect ...) ...)
To my understanding, collect is not a literal. Can I turn the collect macro
itself into a syntax class
You might want to specify collect in #:datum-literals if it is not a
defined name.
Can you describe some usage examples? That may lead to better insight
for the implementation.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Deren Dohoda deren.doh...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppose I have a macro (experiment ...)
Hi Stephen,
At the moment, collect is syntax, itself defined through syntax-parse. So
you suggest making collect a literal and changing the underlying macro
name?
It's part of a #lang experiment I'm writing which manages a series of
actions from a controller. The file, when required, provides a
3 matches
Mail list logo
