Re: [racket-users] Any work on demo.racket-lang.org?

Matthew, I’m no lawyer, but... On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 4:45:29 PM UTC+1, Matthew Butterick wrote: > PS about Rosetta Code generally. As a user, its utility is hugely > undermined by the fact that I can't take code from the site and easily > adapt / reuse it (at least, if I want to comply

Re: [racket-users] Any work on demo.racket-lang.org?

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 3:14 AM, Tim Brown wrote: > > 1 Volume: there are 932 tasks implemented on Rosetta Code; all of > which have some value. Since I have contributed a fair number of > these, I know that there is a good amount of time required to just > review each of

Re: [racket-users] Any work on demo.racket-lang.org?

Matthew, Food for thought -- so here’s a bit of thinking out loud. On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 3:42:32 AM UTC+1, Matthew Butterick wrote: > Instead of a wiki, perhaps consider collecting demo code samples into > a new Racket package & adding explanations via Scribble docs. In turn, > these

Re: [racket-users] Any work on demo.racket-lang.org?

> "Make a web page (demo.racket-lang ?) that contains Racket snippets. > > I'm looking to: > > b. make up some kind of curated wiki to host that code (and examples > from other sources) > c. make Racket look as capable of everything as we all know it is Instead of a wiki, perhaps consider