On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:24:39PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Alternatively, and simpler: you might have two window panes, one in which
> the user writes Scribble source, and another that gives an almost-live
> semi-WYSIWYG view of how the source would render. Ideally have the
>
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 01:24:23AM +0200, Jos Koot wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> Put it your way it seems managable for a simple user like me.
> I don't immediately see how to follow all details of your advice,
> but I'll look into it in due time. I'll need time for that
> and probably from time to time
On Apr 28, 2017, at 5:03 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 4/28/17 1:13 PM, James wrote:
>> https://github.com/mgorlick/CRESTaceans/tree/master/bindings/libsodium
>> https://github.com/tonyg/racl/tree/master
>
> I'm the author of racl. I've not used mgorlick's code, but one
Thanks Neil. I'm aware of the problem of implementation issues, in general,
but I am new to Racket. So, if I understand correctly, this would argue for
using the OpenSSL Racket module for TLS. I think that's the most sensitive
part, in terms of C/C++ bugs and failures, since it's network
I'm working on a #lang for configuration files for a larger project I'm
working on, and I'm trying to find a setup that meets my (largely cosmetic)
goals without producing a "standard-module-name-resolver: cycle in loading"
error.
Given the following directory structure:
- my-project/
-
Hi Meino,
Glad to hear everything is working now!
Thanks for reporting this usability issue in the installer. I'll look
into it.
Vincent
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:42:24 -0500,
tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> It was a layer eight error...(mine).
>
> It seems that answering "Yes" to
I've thought about this a little bit and I don't think that a simple
fix is forthcoming, so I've disabled the offending code for now and
hope to return to this another time.
The preferences dialog should now work for git-based builds (and
assuming all goes well with the snapshots tonight, the
Hendrik Boom wrote on 04/30/2017 08:25 AM:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:24:39PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Alternatively, and simpler: you might have two window panes, one in which
the user writes Scribble source, and another that gives an almost-live
semi-WYSIWYG view of how the source would
> On Apr 29, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Alternatively, and simpler: you might have two window panes, one in which the
> user writes Scribble source, and another that gives an almost-live
> semi-WYSIWYG view of how the source would render.
FWIW, Pollen
The Bootstrap project has been hard at work to make WeScheme accessible,
including some sensible expand/collapse options for viewing code and options.
See the post at
http://www.bootstrapworld.org/blog/accessibility/User-Interface-REPL.shtml
for some basic information. There are at least two
If someone hasn’t already done this, I’ve got a few CS Ed papers for sure….
I’m looking at Python now, but this should be much easier in Racket: I’d like
to put together a simple syntax for unenforced data definitions and signatures,
then use instructor help to map these to course-specific
I am working on an ant colony simulation/game/thing. Right now I'm using
2htdp/universe and 2htdp/image and the racket language. To represent an ant, I
made a struct with a position, angle, and carrying-food?. To test the speed of
the simulation I made a new ant with a random angle on every
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Vityou wrote:
>
> I am working on an ant colony simulation/game/thing. Right now I'm using
> 2htdp/universe and 2htdp/image and the racket language. To represent an ant,
> I made a struct with a position, angle, and carrying-food?. To test
13 matches
Mail list logo