Re: [racket-users] DrRacket complete word more convenient setting

>> >> Is there some particular image functionality that drracket has, that > isn't supported in racket mode? > 1. On my notebook I use terminal emacs with wsl2. 2. I really a vim user, so I'm just learning emacs now (with doom emacs and evil). 3. I want to use a DrRacket as a programmable

[racket-users] Can we provide a list of functions?

I'm quite new to racket, so please pardon me if this is a dumb question. I'm working my way through the first tutorial in Beautiful Racket , and want to extend it. He only provides + and * as operators. I added support for others. The problem is

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket complete word more convenient setting

> > In fact, Emacs suits me very well, but for working with images I would > like to use DrRaket. > I wonder what about images makes you want to leave emacs, when you run `racket-run` (racket mode) from a racket module file in emacs it executes (and enters) that module and then opens a split

Re: [racket-users] Can we provide a list of functions?

Den tor. 17. jun. 2021 kl. 15.37 skrev Yossu Bonkers : > I'm quite new to racket, so please pardon me if this is a dumb question. > > I'm working my way through the first tutorial in Beautiful Racket > , and want to extend it. > He only provides +

Re: [racket-users] Can we provide a list of functions?

Wow, what a reply! Thanks. As I said, I'm quite new to Racket, so haven't got my head around macros yet. I have a basic idea, but am not up to writing my own yet. If you wouldn't mind showing me something, with some explanatory comments if you could, it would be great. Thanks again On

Re: [racket-users] Why would writing to a pipe fail?

At Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:33:56 -0400, George Neuner wrote: > On 6/16/2021 3:45 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > At Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:25:40 -0400, George Neuner wrote: > > > It looks like the problem > > > is that "flush" is not defined ... > > > > Yes, "returns without blocking after writing as many

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket complete word more convenient setting

Thanks you. But that's not what I wanted. In fact, Emacs suits me very well, but for working with images I would like to use DrRaket. But minor inconveniences get in the way - like the lack of a familiar auto-completion and inconvenient hints. It is a pity that I am still far from having a

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket complete word more convenient setting

Then you may be interested in DrComplete: https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/drcomplete On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:54 AM Andrey wrote: > Thanks you. But that's not what I wanted. In fact, Emacs suits me very > well, but for working with images I would like to use DrRaket. But minor >