Re: [racket-users] raco run but (please) dont process the docs

Asumu Takikawa [16-10-23 18:12]: > Hi Meino, > > On 2016-10-23 11:09:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > It there any way to tell raco what kind > > of doc processing is wanted and what don't? > > In addition to Daniel's answer, there is a temporary workaround you

[racket-users] filesystem-change-evt and thread-suspend

Hi everyone, I've been trying to get to know Racket's threads and particularly filesystem-change-evt, and I've come to a point of confusion. I thought that a filesystem-change-evt's synchronization result was supposed to be the event itself, which it is most of the time, but in combination

[racket-users] Re: Logging and stdout in web-server

Does anyone have any tips on how to turn on transparent request logging from this question above? 2) How do I insert the transparent request logger in my dispatch-rules so that request info will be shown on stdout? Thanks! Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[racket-users] Re: Logging and stdout in web-server

Well, that was ridiculously easy. Thanks! Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options,

Re: [racket-users] Request for comments: An embedded DSL for CSS in Racket

I have been writing my CSS engine. [sorry this reply might be a little off-topic here] Long period before, someone in this mailing list asked if their are user editable configuration file formats that can be used in real world applications. `info.rkt` might be a choice but it is not designed for

Re: [racket-users] If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument?

> On Nov 13, 2016, at 06:42, David Storrs wrote: > > Thanks, all. Points well taken and I'll go back to writing lambda (x). I > appreciate the pointer to those packages, though. Minor point; you know that you can type λ directly in DrRacket using cmd-backslash,

Re: [racket-users] Re: What is the fastest way to find the total free space on the disk?

I have written one in my project this task varies both from OS and filesystem. https://github.com/digital-world/sakuyamon/blob/master/digitama/posix.c It works on Solaris/Linux/MacOSX, and collects more sysinfo metrics than just disk usage. `ffi_prefab_ksysinfo` is the main struct, and

Re: [racket-users] Re: If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument?

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Ian Barland wrote: > [...] > > Also, in this particular case, my chafing at the extra-characters was > ameliorated by a tip from Eli Barzilay: drop the space after the "λ", > e.g. `(λ(n) (+ n 1))`. It's still quite readable, and whittles

Re: [racket-users] If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument?

Thanks, all. Points well taken and I'll go back to writing lambda (x). I appreciate the pointer to those packages, though. On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:22:42PM -0800, David Storrs wrote: > > The 'thunk' procedure is

Re: [racket-users] If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument?

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:22:42PM -0800, David Storrs wrote: > The 'thunk' procedure is really useful and is sprinkled liberally through > my code because it saves keystrokes / is clearer than (lambda () ...). I > often find myself writing (lambda (x) ...) for something and wishing that > there

Re: [racket-users] Re: If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument?

> Personally however, I recommend against such a macro ... > This is the kind of feature where everyone's got their own favorite syntax for it. > +1 on this wisdom, for this particular construct. I used my own personalized macro for several years, but finally decided it wasn't worth the cost of

[racket-users] Re: If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument?

I'm assuming you intend to *use* the argument, in which case this is a trickier macro to write than `thunk` because you have to make sure the macro respects scope properly. If you wanted a function that accepts one argument and ignores it, you can use `const`. Otherwise, you can implement a