Re: [racket-users] [Racket-users] IMAP with racket

p.s. I just found this: https://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/gh/gapi.plt/1/3/planet-docs/manual/Examples.html which leads here: https://github.com/greghendershott/gapi/blob/master/examples/macro/gplus-oauth.rkt and looks promising. (I didn't find any signs of oauth use in sirmail

Re: [racket-users] [Racket-users] IMAP with racket

Bravo! This parallels my motivation. I'm kind of a beginner in Racket, but it is powerful, portable, elegant, well-documented, and well-supported, so I keep dabbling ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [racket-users] [Racket-users] IMAP with racket

Anthony Carrico writes: > FYI, on the subject of Racket + IMAP: > > 1. Greg Hendershott's feeds2gmail pushes RSS feeds to the gmail host > over IMAP. I fixed a few gmail specific bugs and limitations making it a > general "feeds2imap" in this branch: >

Re: [racket-users] IMAP with racket

Thanks, all, this rings a bell and I note that: https://docs.racket-lang.org/webapi/oauth2.html says use with caution. I will look around and see if I can figure out how to do imap in conjunction with oauth2. Cheers, Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [racket-users] IMAP with racket

I have used net/imap with gmail, though it does require enabling "less secure apps" (the link George sent has instructions). I believe the only "less secure" part is that you want to use IMAP for authentication and not OAuth. -Philip On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 7:55 AM, George Neuner

[racket-users] [Racket-users] IMAP with racket

FYI, on the subject of Racket + IMAP: 1. Greg Hendershott's feeds2gmail pushes RSS feeds to the gmail host over IMAP. I fixed a few gmail specific bugs and limitations making it a general "feeds2imap" in this branch: https://github.com/acarrico/feeds2gmail/tree/imap I've tested this with the

Re: [racket-users] Programming paradigms supported by Racket (according to wikipedia)

> On Feb 11, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Greg Trzeciak wrote: > > I have stumbled upon the following wiki page: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages > > Supported paradigms: > --- > Language: Racket > Num­ber of

Re: [racket-users] Programming paradigms supported by Racket (according to wikipedia)

Le 11/02/2017 à 14:31, Greg Trzeciak a écrit : I have stumbled upon the following wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages Supported paradigms: --- Language: Racket Num­ber of Para­digms: 6 ... According to the same

Re: [racket-users] IMAP with racket

On 2/11/2017 7:04 AM, Tim Hanson wrote: I have successfully connected to two of the mail servers I use this way, but not yet to gmail. Has anyone successfully connected to gmail using either of the approaches tested here? Maybe someone can point out what I'm doing wrong? I haven't messed

[racket-users] Programming paradigms supported by Racket (according to wikipedia)

I have stumbled upon the following wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages Supported paradigms: --- Language: Racket Num­ber of Para­digms: 6 Con­cur­rent: No Con­straints: No Data­flow: No De­clar­at­ive: No

Re: [racket-users] IMAP with racket

Thanks again for several helpful pointers. I've recorded humble beginnings here: https://github.com/tbhanson/imap-with-racket Comments and suggestions very welcome. (I know in particular I'd like to have a handy way to store my credentials somewhere, am using ~/.myImapCreds for now, but am