This is a little awkward, there are lots of simple classes defined in
racket/draw, font%, color%, pen%, brush% and so on. They just hold a group
of plain data, hence opportunities to be inspected easily. However by
default all classes are opaque, the easiest (and perhaps unique) way to
handle this
It's a bug in the pkg-build process, and I should have it fixed for the
next build.
At Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:11:08 -0400, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Thanks, Philip -- that could well be a bug in the catalog UI. I can't
> check it out until after the OOPSLA deadline, so I've filed
>
Thanks, Philip -- that could well be a bug in the catalog UI. I can't
check it out until after the OOPSLA deadline, so I've filed
https://github.com/tonyg/racket-pkg-website/issues/42 to keep track of
it until then.
Regards,
Tony
On 04/11/2017 01:21 PM, Philip McGrath wrote:
> I recently
I recently posted a package "recaptcha", and I noticed a problem with the
documentation link that I'm not sure how to fix. Google stylizes the name
as reCAPTCHA, and I've capitalized it that way in the title of the
documentation, but I called the actual package "recaptcha" so that you can
"raco
Is it possible to give a name to a contract created with
contract-with-explanation?
To illustrate, this example:
> #lang racket
> (define has-explanation/c
> (flat-contract-with-explanation
>(λ (val)
> (λ (blame)
>(raise-blame-error blame val
>
On 10/04/17 17:02, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
Let me ask a few questions that may nudge you a bit:
What is an example of a system you want to model?
For instance:
Do you want to be able to model simple linear motion? Uniform acceleration?
Do you want to be able to model predator-prey? Or
6 matches
Mail list logo
