On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 5:15:12 AM UTC+8, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> 2017-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Vincent St-Amour :
> (For people following along, the issue is that there exists a value `x`
>
> such that `(= (+ x 1e-17) x)`, and that the iteration reaches that
It's a little ugly, but you can change the exit handler:
(exit-handler
(λ (x) (displayln "Called exit")))
-Philip
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Matt Jadud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to spawn a browser frame, but I'd like it if the frame did
> not terminate the
Hi all,
I would like to spawn a browser frame, but I'd like it if the frame did not
terminate the thread when I close it. I'm having a hard time figuring out what
I should override/augment or catch so that I can spawn the frame from within a
GUI application, let the user close the frame, and
I agree. I'll add a note to the docs.
Vincent
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:16:49 -0500,
Tim Jervis wrote:
>
> I like the document route; anyone who is happy with the performance tradeoff
> would be free to implement a more conservative version.
>
> On 17 Apr 2017, at 21:59, Ben Greenman
I like the document route; anyone who is happy with the performance tradeoff
would be free to implement a more conservative version.
> On 17 Apr 2017, at 21:59, Ben Greenman wrote:
>
> Maybe, just add a note to the docs?
>
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:56 PM,
2017-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Vincent St-Amour
:
> (For people following along, the issue is that there exists a value `x`
> such that `(= (+ x 1e-17) x)`, and that the iteration reaches that `x`
> as its state at some point, then loops.)
>
What is the smallest y
Maybe, just add a note to the docs?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Vincent St-Amour <
stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> The latter is easy to fix; I've submitted a pull request.
>
> The former is trickier. The problem is not so much due to the step size
> itself, but rather to a
The latter is easy to fix; I've submitted a pull request.
The former is trickier. The problem is not so much due to the step size
itself, but rather to a combination of the step size and of a particular
iteration state.
(For people following along, the issue is that there exists a value `x`
such
Hi Alexander,
Thank you for the nice words, neighbor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
Call for participation: PLDI 2017 and co-located events
PLDI is the premier forum in the field of programming languages and
programming systems research, covering the areas of design,
implementation, theory, applications, and performance. The co-located
conferences take place in Barcelona, June
Leandro,
Your article comes at a good time for me because I received my copy of
"Semantics Engineering with PLT Redex" last week and am preparing to start
studying it. I thought your examples are a nice exposition of the complex ideas
that go into selecting features a programming language
The error message is unclear but I believe SQLite do not support parameters for
PRAGMA statements.
The SQLite documentation at http://www.sqlite.org/lang_expr.html#varparam
specifically says parameters are supported by expressions. PRAGMA statements
are not expressions.
If you examine the
Dear Racket Users,
I’ve noticed the following procedure calls don’t return (on my 64 bit Mac
hardware):
(range (- 1 1e-16) 1.0 1e-17)
(range 0 1 0)
While (2) is obvious, (1) tripped me up (as I hadn’t noticed my step size had
fallen to effectively zero).
A small tweak to for.rkt in the
13 matches
Mail list logo