> On Oct 13, 2017, at 18:52, Geoffrey Knauth wrote:
>
> Maybe do undisputedly?-evil name-mangling now to get things working,
> then become a saint with a better solution down the road. Sometimes
> I don't realize how to do something the "good" way until I've traveled
> down
What a pity to live so far away (Buenos Aires, Argentina) from such
interesting events...
But at least I would have the chance to watch the livestreams ! Thanks for
sharing them !
El sábado, 14 de octubre de 2017, 3:23:15 (UTC-3), Jack Firth escribió:
>
> This is really cool, thanks for
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Luis Marcelo Rosso wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am porting the Prolog interpreter shown in Peter Norvig's classic text on
> AI, "Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming: Case Studies in Common
> Lisp 1st Edition",
>
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Ran Mackeson wrote:
>
> Htdp and Racket have given me much enjoyment. I have just started to play
> with racket gui. My Racket version is 6.10.1 and on both Linux Mint 17 and
> Ubuntu 16.04 the behaviour of 'iconize' puzzles me:
>
> #lang
Lovely! I was thinking along these lines, but you hit it out of the park.
Sounds like you must be avoiding some really important task!
John
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 11:31, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2017 05:01 AM, George Neuner wrote:
>> On 10/14/2017 3:00 AM, Jack
>
> > Racket doesn't play well with existing code bases (except C things)
> > and so my hypothesis is simply that to gain adoption of Racket, you
> > need to solve problems that aren't in the "production path." Good
> > thing there are *lots* of those! All those Python scripts you have?
> >
On 10/14/2017 05:01 AM, George Neuner wrote:
On 10/14/2017 3:00 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
So is there a way ... from normal code ... to get at the locals of
functions higher in the call chain? Or at least the immediate
caller?
Some reflective capability that I haven't yet
Htdp and Racket have given me much enjoyment. I have just started to play
with racket gui. My Racket version is 6.10.1 and on both Linux Mint 17 and
Ubuntu 16.04 the behaviour of 'iconize' puzzles me:
#lang racket/gui
(define frame
(new frame%
[label "Example"]
[width 400]
Am 13.10.2017 um 00:20 schrieb Andrew Gwozdziewycz:
> Racket doesn't play well with existing code bases (except C things)
> and so my hypothesis is simply that to gain adoption of Racket, you
> need to solve problems that aren't in the "production path." Good
> thing there are *lots* of those! All
On 10/14/2017 3:00 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
So is there a way ... from normal code ... to get at the locals of
functions higher in the call chain? Or at least the immediate
caller?
Some reflective capability that I haven't yet discovered?
I'm not sure if there's a way to do
>
> So is there a way ... from normal code ... to get at the locals of
> functions higher in the call chain? Or at least the immediate caller?
> Some reflective capability that I haven't yet discovered?
>
I'm not sure if there's a way to do that, but I'm wondering if what you
want to do can
Hi all,
This is a bit difficult to explain, so bear with me.
I have a very simple macro which generates a runtime call to a normal
function. The macro is so the arguments can be [more or less] free
form expressions - the runtime function is because the computations
are not simple and some of
This is really cool, thanks for writing about it and sharing it! And thanks
for showing me another book I ought to get around to reading.
There were some very interesting talks last weekend at RacketCon 2017
related to logic programming, program synthesis, and unification that you
might be
13 matches
Mail list logo