Thanks all.
MP
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 9:05:19 AM UTC+5:30, Andrew
Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:37, Neil Van Dyke > wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure, but I suspect many employers might also want you to say
> "agile", "scrum", and "bro" a lot, preferably with
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:37, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> I'm not sure, but I suspect many employers might also want you to say
> "agile", "scrum", and "bro" a lot, preferably with an affable Californian
> surfer accent. :)
SHRED THE GNAR!
--
You received this message because you are
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 3:46 PM 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> OK, so I understand now that what I want is an unimplemented feature,
> but in most compilers these days and certainly those based in LLVM and
> GCC there's a feature called whole-program
On 9/25/18 1:11 PM, Alexis King wrote:
[] Personally, I would appreciate a way to ask
Racket to strip all phase ≥1 code and phase ≥1 dependencies from a
specified program so that I can distribute the phase 0 code and
dependencies exclusively. However, to my knowledge, Racket does not
On 25/09/2018 20:11, Alexis King wrote:
> (Sorry, Paulo, for the duplicate message; I forgot to Reply All the
> first time.)
>
> This is sort of subtle. When we consider a macro-enabled language, we
> often imagine that `expand` takes a program with some phase ≥1 code,
> expands all the macros
In the docs for raco exe, there exists a switch `--config-path` that you
can specify to tell the executable to look in this directory for a config
file. Is there a way to set this as a runtime path instead? When OS X runs
my test program, it'll have Cmd-, set as the default shortcut for opening
(Sorry, Paulo, for the duplicate message; I forgot to Reply All the
first time.)
This is sort of subtle. When we consider a macro-enabled language, we
often imagine that `expand` takes a program with some phase ≥1 code,
expands all the macros in the program by running the phase ≥1 code, and
Racket doesn't have much frameworks. You will probably do from-scratch
a lot more in Racket.
Any time you think "framework" from some other language, probably either
it is easy to do what you want with the Racket base language features or
a small existing package, or you will have to put
BTW, I don't know the status of possible new GPL and LGPL versions in
progress, but, if any Racket people have some insights into how to
improve the "linking" concepts or some other aspect, in the spirit of
FSF goals, the FSF has seemed open to comments. If you don't know who
else to contact,
Hi,
I reached a point at which I don't think I am exactly understanding how
the racket compilation pipeline works.
My software has several compile time options that use environment
variables to be read (since I can't think of another way to do it) so I
define a compile time variable as:
On 25/09/2018 12:42, Daniel Brunner wrote:
>> with java based frameworks like Spring Boot for developing
>> Microservices? Do you see organizations adopting Racket or Racket based
>> languages slowly?
>
> We are providing services on Amazon Web Services for handling the data
> of sensors (less
> with java based frameworks like Spring Boot for developing
> Microservices? Do you see organizations adopting Racket or Racket based
> languages slowly?
We are providing services on Amazon Web Services for handling the data
of sensors (less than 2,000) in the oil and gas market. Several
вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 9:46, Madhav Peshwa :
>
> Hi all,
> I am reading the book Htdp and learning Racket and enjoying. I would like to
> know Racket usage in enterprise(read software in java!) I can see there are
> great packages for json/http etc. How does it compare with java based
>
Hi all,
I am reading the book Htdp and learning Racket and enjoying. I would like
to know Racket usage in enterprise(read software in java!) I can see there
are great packages for json/http etc. How does it compare with java based
frameworks like Spring Boot for developing Microservices? Do
14 matches
Mail list logo
