On 3/7/2019 6:50 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no
`break-evt`? The existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that
it is possible to have mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing
on an event or raising a break. And we have an
At Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:50:40 -0800, Jack Firth wrote:
> Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no `break-evt`? The
> existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that it is possible to have
> mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing on an event or raising a
> break. And
Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no `break-evt`? The
existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that it is possible to have
mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing on an event or raising a
break. And we have an analogous construct for `sync/timeout` in the form
3 matches
Mail list logo
