Re: [racket-users] Feasibility of Racket for scientific and engineering calculations

Hi Marc, Take a look at: https://github.com/soegaard/racket-cas Start with the readme and play with a few examples. Skim (later parts) of: https://github.com/soegaard/racket-cas/blob/master/racket-cas/racket-cas.rkt to see what's implemented. Any bug reports and comments are welcome.

Re: [racket-users] Feasibility of Racket for scientific and engineering calculations

Since you mention symbolic computations: is there anything that does symbolic differentiation in Racket - I know Maxima is written in Common Lisp. I would I would be happy with only differentiation and little of the other stuff, if only to check my own computations (in economics) as I have

Re: [racket-users] Feasibility of Racket for scientific and engineering calculations

A few useful resources: Matrices http://docs.racket-lang.org/math/matrices.html?q=matrix GNU Scientific Library http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/wmfarr/mzgsl.plt/3/0/planet-docs/mzgsl/index.html Science Collection

Re: [racket-users] Feasibility of Racket for scientific and engineering calculations

Those are great resources! Thanks! Jens Axel Søgaard writes: > A few useful resources: > > Matrices > http://docs.racket-lang.org/math/matrices.html?q=matrix > > GNU Scientific Library > > http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/wmfarr/mzgsl.plt/3/0/planet-docs/mzgsl/index.html > >

[racket-users] Feasibility of Racket for scientific and engineering calculations

Hi all, I am exploring whether Racket could be a Lisp replacement for Python in scientific and engineering calculations. I currently use Python extensively in teaching chemical engineering courses (http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/pycse/) and in running molecular simulations